Cases 31 - 40 of 93
Lefkowitz v. Westreich
as 17-3711
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Gary Lefkowitz, Individual
Defendant - Appellee:
Leslie Westreich, Individual, Shira Seidel Westreich, Adam Westreich and others
Defendant:
Citi-Manhattan Partners I, California Limited Partnership, Citi-Manhattan Patners III, California Limited Partnership, Citi Frontiers Partners, California Limited Partnership and others
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 17-2942
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant - Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cooper v. DST Systems, Inc.
as 17-2805
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Clive V. Cooper, individually and as a representative of a class of similarly situated plan participants, on behalf of the DST Systems, Inc. 401(K) Profit Sharing Plan
Defendant - Appellee:
Ruane Cunniff & Goldfarb Inc.
Defendant:
DST Systems, Inc., The Advisory Committee of the DST Systems, Inc. 401(K) Profit Sharing Plan, The Compensation Committee of the Board of Directors of DST Systems, Inc. and others
Reyes v. United States Marshals Office
as 17-1970
Plaintiff - Appellee:
Ciara Reyes, AKA Sheila Rivera
Defendant:
United States Marshals Service, New York State Division of Parole, Oni Penzarvis, Commissioner of the New York State Department of Correctional Services and others
Defendant - Appellant:
Brian Fischer, former Commissioner of New York State Department of Correctional Services, in his individual capacity, Anthony J. Annucci, Acting Commissioner of the New York State Department of Corrections and Community Supervision, former Executive Deputy Commissioner, Deputy Commissioner, and Counsel of New York State Department of Correctional Services, in his individ and Terrence X. Tracy, Chief Counsel for New York State Division of Parole, in his individual capacity
In Re: Lidya Maria Radin
as 17-1965
Petitioner:
Lidya Maria Radin
Respondent:
United States of America, Chief United States District Court Judge Colleen McMahon, Acting United States Attorney Joon Kim and others
Conte v. County of Nassau
as 17-869
Plaintiff - Appellee:
Anthony Conte
Defendant:
Larry Guerra, City of New York, Rhoda Zwicker, Individually and as a Clerk in the Nassau County District Attorney's Office, Nassau County, New York and others
Defendant - Appellant:
Bob Emmons, Individually and as Assistant District Attorney of Nassau County, New York, William Wallace, Individually and as Assistant District Attorney of Nassau County, New York and Mike Falzarno, Individually and as Special Investigator for the Office of the District Attorney of Nassau County, New York
McIntosh v. City of New York
as 17-617
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Iman McIntosh
Defendant - Appellee:
City of New York, Police Officer Harold Taylor, Sergeant Hong Chen and others
Defendant:
Kristopher Vecchio and John/Jane Does, 1-20
Santiago v. City of New York
as 16-3586
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Jesus Santiago
Defendant - Appellee:
City of New York
Defendant:
John Does 1-20, being the fictitious names of the New York City Police Officers whose names are not known to Plaintiff, individually and in their official capacities
Cooksey v. Simmon
as 16-3519
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Calvin Edward Cooksey, in his individual capacity as biological father parent of Christopher Edwind Cooksey, who is also known as Lonny Breaux, Christopher Lonny Breaux, and legal name (allegedly) Christopher Francis Ocean, Frank Ocean
Defendant - Appellee:
Global Grind Digital, a corporation
Defendant:
Russell Wendell Simmons, in his individual and professioonal capacity as Editor and Chief of Global Grind Digital, Brittany Lewis, in her individual and professional capacity as Global Grind Digital, internet news reported, Accel Partners, a corporation and associate partner with Global Grind Digital and others
Pullman v. Alpha Media Publishing, Inc.
as 14-3551
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Jaclinn Pullman
Defendant - Appellee:
ALPHA MEDIA PUBLISHING, INC., FKA Dennis Publishing, Inc., QUADRANGLE GROUP, LLC, Stephen Colvin and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
