Cases filed in the U.S. Court of Appeals, Second Circuit
Cases 41 - 50 of 87
Deutsche Bank Americas Holding v. Moreno
as 17-2911
Petitioner: Deutsche Bank Americas Holding Corp., Deutsche Bank Americas Holding Corp. Executive Committee, Richard O'Connell and others
Respondent: Ramon Moreno, Individually and as representatives of a class of similarly situated persons and on behalf of the Deutsche Bank Matched Savings Plan, Donald O'Halloran, Individually and as representatives of a class of similarly situated persons and on behalf of the Deutsche Bank Matched Savings Plan, Omkharan Arasarantnam and others
Movant: United States Chamber of Commerce
United States of America v. Pasha
as 17-2393
Plaintiff - Appellee: United States of America
Defendant - Appellant: Mohammad S. Pasha, AKA Saad Pasha, AKA Assd Pasha, AKA Paul Pasha, AKA George Hofer, AKA Mike Matuchi, AKA Abdul Oayyum, AKA Olan Mills, AKA James Reed, AKA James Hill, Mike Chambers, AKA Mohammad Pasha, AKA Mohammad Saad Pasha, AKA Muhammad Saad Pasha, A
Reaves v. New York State Supreme Court f
as 17-1596
Plaintiff - Appellant: Kevin Reaves
Defendant - Appellee: New York State Supreme Court for the Second Judicial District, Sylvia G. Ash, Bruce M. Balter and others
United States of America v. Pasha
as 17-1193
Plaintiff - Appellee: United States of America
Defendant - Appellant: Mohammad Saad Pasha, AKA Saad Pasha, AKA Assd Pasha, AKA Paul Pasha, AKA George Hofer, AKA Mike Matuchi, AKA Abdul Oayyum, AKA Olan Mills, AKA James Reed, AKA James Hill, Mike Chambers, AKA Mohammad Pasha, AKA Mohammad S. Pasha, AKA Mohammed S. Pasha, AKA
Bennett v. Correct Care Solutions, LLC
as 17-1011
Plaintiff - Appellant: Donald Bennett
Defendant - Appellee: Correct Care Solutions, LLC, Individual & Officially, Chief Director Dr. Raul Ulloa, Chronic Care Dr. Delores Curbella and others
Harkey v. General Electric Company
as 17-798
Plaintiff: Betty Harkey, individually and on behalf of herself and all others similarly situated
Petitioner: General Electric Company
Plaintiff - Respondent: Glen Grayson, individually and on behalf of themselves and all others similarly situated, Doreen Mazzanti, individually and on behalf of themselves and all others similarly situated, Daniel Levy, individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated and others
Movant: Chamber of Commerce of the United States of America, Association of Home Appliance Manufacturers, "AHAM" and National Association of Manufacturers, "NAM"
Chambers v. Pierre
as 16-3470
Plaintiff - Appellant: Robert Chambers
Defendant - Appellee: John Pierre, James Watson, Individual and Official Capacities, Jon Brighthaupt, Warden, Individual and Official Capacities and others
Defendant: Fitzner, ARC, Individual and Official Capacities, Scott Semple, Deputy Commissioner, Individual and Official Capacities and Jennifer Peterson, C/S, Individual and Official Capacities
Ekryss v. Ignite Restaurant Group, Inc.
as 16-3408
Plaintiff / Appellant: Bryan Bland, Tarah L. Clemens, Toni Lacada Newborn and others
Defendant / Appellee: Kevin Cottingim, Dean Riesen, Raymond A. Blanchette, III and others
Plaintiff: Richard Kevin Toole and Brooke Allison Stevens
Defendant: Ignite Restaurant Group, Inc.
James Benenson III and Clement v. Commissioner of Internal Reven
as 16-2956
Petitioner - Appellant: James Benenson III and Clement Chambers Bennenson Trust and James Benenson, Jr., Fiduciary
Respondent - Appellee: Commissioner of Internal Revenue
MIC General Insurance Company v. Chambers
as 16-2862
Plaintiff-Counter-Defendant - Appellant: MIC General Insurance Company
Defendant-Counter-Claimant - Appellee: Wanema Allen, as mother and natural guardian of Bradley DeSilva
Defendant - Appellee: Shawn Chambers, as mother and natural guardian of Bradley DeSilva
Defendant: Pertie Chambers, as mother and natural guardian of Bradley DeSilva and Ferdinand Chambers, as mother and natural guardian of Bradley DeSilva

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?