Cases filed in the U.S. Court of Appeals, Second Circuit
Cases 51 - 60 of 601
Nationstar Mortgage LLC v. Dadi
as 22-2694
Plaintiff / Appellee: Nationstar Mortgage LLC, DBA Champion Mortgage Co
Defendant: Secretary of Housing and Urban Development
Defendant / Appellant: Ahmed A. Dadi
Walsh v. Top Notch Home Designs Corp.
as 22-2609
Plaintiff / Appellee: Martin J. Walsh, Secretary of Labor, United States Department of Labor
Defendant / Appellant: Top Notch Home Designs Corp. and Leonidis Luis Priftakis, Individually and as the Owner
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 22-2298
Petitioner: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Parker v. Haaland
as 22-2310
Plaintiff / Appellant: Jamal Parker
Defendant / Appellee: Debra Anne Haaland, Secretary of the Dept. of the Interior, Andrew Saul, Charles Paul Rettig Martin and others
Todd v. Eisele
as 22-1995
Plaintiff / Appellant: Ronnie Ramael Todd, Moor beneficiary Ramael Black Well El Trust a Emperor, Admiral, Mariner, Piloter a private Moor aboriginal new yorker national, and Subject of the Al Maroc Shereefian Empire
Defendant / Appellee: Brett Eisele, Central Pinal Justice Court Precinct 3 et al.,, Antony J. Blinken, Secretary of State et al.,, Alejandro Mayorkas, Secretary of Homeland Security et al., and others
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 22-1963
Petitioner: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 22-1951
Petitioner: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 22-1833
Petitioner: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Edelman v. United States Government
as 22-1828
Plaintiff / Appellant: Gary Edelman
Defendant / Appellee: United States Government, Navient Solutions, LLC, Stradley Ronnon Stevens and Young and others
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 22-1752
Petitioner: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent: Plaintiff v. Defendant

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?