Cases 81 - 90 of 134
Vessa v. City of White Plains
as 14-1274
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Frank Vessa
Defendant:
John Doe 1-10, said names being ficticious and presently unknown, Mary Doe 1-10, said names being ficticious and presently unknown, Westchester County District Attorney's Office and others
Defendant - Appellee:
City of White Plains, City of White Plains Police Department, Detective Lieutenant Eric Fischer and others
Mitchell v. The City of New York
as 14-767
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Melinda Mitchell, individually and on behalf of a class of all others similarly situated and Harvey Mitchell, individually and on behalf of a class of all others similarly situated
Defendant - Appellee:
City of New York, a municipal entitty, NYC Police Officer James Schuessler, Shield No. 28718, Richard Roes, 1-50 New York City Police Supervisors and Commanders and others
Chen v. Ma
as 14-664
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Weiming Chen, Preparatory Committee of Statue of Democracy (Foundation), 1919 Madison Avenue, Apt. 417, New York, NY 10005
Defendant - Appellee:
Ying-jeou Ma, The President of the Republic of China, Taiwan (ROC), 122 Chongqing South Road, Zhongzheng District, Taipei, Taiwan, ROC c/o Taipei Economic &Cultural Office (TECO) 1 East 42nd Street, 11th Floor, New York, NY 100176904, Hsi-lung Lee, The Chief of the Bureau of Civil Affairs Government of Kinmen County, 60 Minshend Rd, Jincheng Tsp., Kinmen County 893, Taiwan, the Republic of China c/o Taipei Economic &Cultural Office (TECO) 1 East 42nd Street, 11th Floor, New York, NY 10, John Does and others
DePaola v. City of New York
as 13-4417
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Sal DePaola
Defendant - Appellee:
City of New York, A municipal entity, Robert Byrnes, Assistant Chief Fire Marshal, Bureau of Fire Investigation, David Lynn, Assistant Chief Fire Marshall, Bureau of Fire Investigation and others
United States of America v. Roe Corporation 11-cv-1592-1
as 13-4335
Plaintiff:
United States of America, Ex Rel John Doe 11-cv-1592-1 and State of New York
Appellant:
Shahzada Qazi
Defendant - Appellee:
Roe Corporation 11-cv-1592-1, Bushwick United Housing Development Fund Corporation and United Community of Williamsburg Day Care Center, Inc.
Jackson v. City of New York
as 13-4306
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Nancy Jackson
Defendant - Appellee:
City of New York, P.O. Shawn Johnston, P.O. Danielle Campo and others
Newdow v. Congress Of The United States
as 13-4049
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Rosalyn Newdow, Kenneth Bronstein, Benjamin Dreidel and others
Defendant:
Congress Of The United States of America and Timothy F. Geithner, Secretary Of The Treasury
Defendant - Appellee:
United States of America, Richard A. Peterson, Deputy Director, United States Mint, Larry R. Felix, Director, Bureau Of Engraving And Printing and others
Chen v. Ma
as 13-3751
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Weiming Chen, Preparatory Committee of Statue of Democracy (Foundation), 1919 Madison Avenue, Apt. 417, New York, NY 10005
Defendant - Appellee:
Ying-jeou Ma, The President of the Republic of China, Taiwan (ROC), 122 Chongqing South Road, Zhongzheng District, Taipei, Taiwan, ROC c/o Taipei Economic &Cultural Office (TECO) 1 East 42nd Street, 11th Floor, New York, NY 100176904, Hsi-lung Lee, The Chief of the Bureau of Civil Affairs Government of Kinmen County, 60 Minshend Rd, Jincheng Tsp., Kinmen County 893, Taiwan, the Republic of China c/o Taipei Economic &Cultural Office (TECO) 1 East 42nd Street, 11th Floor, New York, NY 10, John Does and others
Morales v. Wei
as 13-3153
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Santos Morales
Defendant - Appellee:
Steven Weiss, Mitchell Rubin, Richard Phelan and others
Kogut v. The County of Nassau
as 13-3130
Plaintiff:
John Restivo, Dennis Halstead, Melissa Lullo and others
Plaintiff - Appellant:
John Kogut
Defendant - Appellee:
The County of Nassau, Police Commissioner Donald Kane, Police Commissioner William J. Willett, (2005) and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
