Cases filed in the U.S. Court of Appeals, Second Circuit
Cases 1 - 10 of 34
Fischer v. Brushy Mountain Bee Farm, Inc.
as 24-122
Plaintiff / Appellant: JAMES H. FISCHER
Defendant / Appellee: BRUSHY MOUNTAIN BEE FARM, INC., BMBF HOLDINGS, INC., HADLEY CAPITAL and others
Defendant: JOHN DOES 1-10 and JOHN DOE ENTITIES 1-10
Clark v. State of Connecticut
as 23-8105
Plaintiff / Appellant: GORDON CLARK, -, in his individual capacity, in his capacities as husband, sole fiduciary, sole beneficiary, and sole creditor of the Estate of Lillian J. Clark
Defendant / Appellee: STATE OF CONNECTICUT, Office of Governor NED LAMONT, OFFICE OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL and others
Brock v. The City of New York
as 23-1148
Plaintiff / Appellant: Mandela Brock
Defendant / Appellee: The City of New York, The Avo Shopping Company and Eric Adams, (in his personal capacity)
Defendant: William DeBlasio, (in his personal capacity)
United States of America v. Arguedas
as 22-1355
Appellee: United States of America
Defendant: Michael Delaguila, AKA Sealed Defendant 2, Steven Justo, AKA Sealed Defendant 3, Davonte Brown, AKA Sealed Defendant 4 and others
Defendant / Appellant: Alexander Arguedas, AKA Sealed Defendant 1
United States of America v. Arguedas (Brock)
as 22-543
Appellee: United States of America
Defendant: Alexander Arguedas, AKA Sealed Defendant 1, Michael Delaguila, AKA Sealed Defendant 2, Steven Justo, AKA Sealed Defendant 3 and others
Defendant / Appellant: Mark Brock, AKA Sealed Defendant 13
Courthouse News Service v. Gabel
as 21-3098
Plaintiff / Appellee: Courthouse News Service, Vermont Press Association, Inc., New England First Amendment Coalition and others
Defendant / Appellant: Patricia Gabel, In her official capacity as the State Court Administrator of the Supreme Court of the State of Vermont, Amanda Stites, in her official capacity as Clerk of Court for Addison, Bennington, and Rutland Counties, Margaret Villeneuve, in her official capacity as Clerk of Court for Caledonia, Essex, Orleans, and Washington Counties and others
Brock v. Zuckerberg
as 21-1796
Plaintiff / Appellant: Mandela Brock
Defendant / Appellee: Mark Zuckerberg, in his individual and corporate capacity, Facebook, Inc., Sheryl K. Sandberg, in her individual and corporate capacity and others
Defendant: John Doe 1-100, in his individual capactiy, Jane Doe 1-100, in her individual capacity and Sean Parker, in his individual and corporate capacity
Geiss v. The Weinstein Company Holdings
as 21-1011
Plaintiff: Melissa Thompson, Nannette Klatt, individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated, Sara Ann Thomas, individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated, AKA Sarah Ann Masse and others
Defendant / Appellee: Nancy Ashbrooke, Richard Koenigsberg, Miramax Film NY, LLC and others
Plaintiff / Appellant: Larissa Gomes, Melissa Sagemiller, individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated, Nannette May, FKA Nannette Klatt and others
Defendant: Miramax Film Corp. and Miramax, LLC
Geiss v. The Weinstein Company Holdings
as 21-1007
Plaintiff: Melissa Thompson, Nannette Klatt, individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated, Sara Ann Thomas, individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated, AKA Sarah Ann Masse and others
Defendant / Appellee: Nancy Ashbrooke, Richard Koenigsberg, Miramax Film NY, LLC and others
Plaintiff / Appellant: Larissa Gomes, Melissa Sagemiller, individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated, Nannette May, FKA Nannette Klatt and others
Defendant: Miramax Film Corp. and Miramax, LLC
Brock v. Zuckerberg
as 21-61
Defendant / Appellee: Facebook, Inc., Mark Zuckerberg, in his individual and corporate capacity and Sheryl K. Sandberg, in her individual and corporate capacity
Plaintiff / Appellant: Mandela Brock
Defendant: Jane Doe 1-100, in her individual capacity, Sean Parker, in his individual and corporate capacity, Mark S. Pincus and others

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?