Cases 1 - 8 of 8
Todd v. Eisele
as 22-1995
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Ronnie Ramael Todd, Moor beneficiary Ramael Black Well El Trust a Emperor, Admiral, Mariner, Piloter a private Moor aboriginal new yorker national, and Subject of the Al Maroc Shereefian Empire
Defendant / Appellee:
Brett Eisele, Central Pinal Justice Court Precinct 3 et al.,, Antony J. Blinken, Secretary of State et al.,, Alejandro Mayorkas, Secretary of Homeland Security et al., and others
State of New York v. Mnuchin
as 19-3962
Plaintiff / Appellant:
State of New Jersey, State of Maryland, State of Connecticut and others
Defendant / Appellee:
David J. Kautter, in his official capacity as Acting Commissioner of the United States Internal Revenue Service, United States Department of Treasury, Steven T. Mnuchin, in his official capacity as Secretary of the United States Department of Treasury and others
Hale v. Dearie
as 19-1150
Defendant / Appellee:
Marsha Diamond, Jeffrey Howell, Henry Shapio and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Roy Hale
Malkan v. Mutua
as 17-228
Plaintiff:
Jeffrey Malkan
Appellant:
Frederic D. Ostrove
Defendant:
Makau W. Mutua and Charles P. Ewing
Appellee:
United States District Court for the Western District of New York
Malkan v. Mutua
as 17-38
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Jeffrey Malkan
Defendant - Appellee:
Makau W. Mutua
Defendant:
Charles P. Ewing
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 14-1425
Plaintiff-Counter-Defendant - Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant-Counter-Claimant - Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Appel v. Spiridon
as 11-3799
Plaintiff-Counter-Defendant - Appellee:
Rosalie Appel
Defendant-Counter-Claimant - Appellant:
Linda Rinker, Charles P. Spiridon and Linda Vaden-Goad
Defendant-Counter-Claimant:
Carold Hawkes, Terry Wells, Margaret Grimes and others
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 11-3675
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant - Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
