Cases 1 - 6 of 6
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 22-2663
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant / Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Brown v. National Bank of Pakistan
as 22-1352
Plaintiff:
Brianna N. Benson
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Harold Brown, Sr., Barbara Brown, Paula Rich and others
Defendant / Appellee:
National Bank of Pakistan
Arelis Araujo v. New York City Department of Ed
as 20-3993
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Janice Torres, as Parents and Natural Guardians of A.L., Edwin Zayas, as Parents and Natural Guardians of RZ, Luis Nunez, Sr., as Parents and Natural Guardians of L.N. and others
Defendant / Appellee:
New York City Department of Education
Abrams v. Carranza
as 20-3899
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Jhoana Juca, Individually as Parent and Natural Guardian of K.A., Piedad Angamarca, Individually as Parent and Natural Guardian of J.G., Vinnie Penna, Individually as Parent and Natural Guardian of E.P. and others
Defendant / Appellee:
Richard Carranza, in his official capacity as the Chancellor of the New York City Department of Education and New York City Department of Education
Montesa v. Schwartz
as 14-3721
Plaintiff - Appellee:
Rebecca Montesa, individually and as a parent and natural guardian of C.W., E.W. and N.W., infants, Marie Jean Baptiste, individually and as a parent and natural guardian of PJB, DJB, and DJB, infants, Israel Mediua, individually and as a parent and natural guardian of H.M., infant and others
Defendant:
East Ramapo Central School District
Defendant - Appellant:
Daniel Schwartz, Yehuda Weissmandl, Moses Friedman and others
Preusser v. Taconic Hills Central School D
as 13-288
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Raymond Preusser, on behalf of his minor son, E.P. and Beverly Preusser, on behalf of her minor son, E.P.
Defendant - Appellee:
Taconic Hills Central School District and John V. Gulisane, Jr., sued in his individual capacity
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
