Cases filed in the U.S. Court of Appeals, Second Circuit
Cases 1 - 10 of 17
The City of New York v. Exxon Mobil Corporation
as 24-1568
Plaintiff: THE CITY OF NEW YORK
Defendant: EXXON MOBIL CORPORATION, EXXONMOBIL OIL CORPORATION, ROYAL DUTCH SHELL PLC and others
Connecticut v. Exxon Mobil Corporation We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 21-1446
Plaintiff / Appellee: State of Connecticut, by its Attorney General, William M. Tong
Defendant / Appellant: Exxon Mobil Corporation
Amicus Curiae: Natural Resources Defense Council, Inc., City of New York and State of New York, Delaware, Hawaii, Maryland, Massachusetts, Minnesota, New Jersey, New Mexico, Oregon, Pennsylvania, Rhode Island, Washington, Wisconsin and District of Columbia
Lai v. United States of America
as 19-2676
Defendant / Appellee: Exxon Mobil Corporation, Commissioner of Social Security, United States of America and others
Plaintiff / Appellant: Kenney Shi Lai
The City of New York v. BP P.L.C. We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 18-2188
Plaintiff - Appellant: The City of New York
Defendant - Appellee: Chevron Corporation, ConocoPhillips, Exxon Mobil Corporation and others
Exxon Mobil Corporation v. Healey We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 18-1170
Plaintiff - Appellant: Exxon Mobil Corporation
Defendant - Appellee: Maura Tracy Healey, In her official capacity as Attorney General of the State of Massachusetts and Eric T. Schneiderman, Attorney General of New York, in his official capacity
Orange County Water District v. Unocal Corp.
as 15-3934
Plaintiff / Appellant: Orange County Water District
Defendant / Appellee: Texaco Refining and Marketing, Inc., NKA TMR Company, Equilon Enterprises LLC, Shell Oil Company, DBA Shell Oil Products US and others
Defendant: Unocal Corporation, ConocoPhillips Company, Chevron U.S.A., Inc., DBA Chevron Products Campany, DBA Chevron Chemical Company and others
Amicus Curiae: Exxon Mobil Corporation, Chevron U.S.A., Inc. and Tesoro Petroleum Corporation.
DMJ Associates, L.L.C. v. Capasso
as 16-3435
Counter Claimant: Clairol, Incorporated, Chemical Leaman Tank Lines, Inc., Rockwell International Corporation and others
Defendant: Ford Motor Company, United States Department of the Air Force, Ingersoll-Rand Company and others
3Rd Party Defendant: Colonial Pipeline Company, Niagara Mohawk Power Corporation, United States Navy and others
Plaintiff: DMJ Associates, L.L.C., AKA DMJ Associates, L.L.C.
Appellant: Revere Copper Products, Inc., AKA Revere Copper & Brass Incorporated
DMJ Associates, L.L.C. v. Capasso
as 16-3435
Plaintiff-Counter-Defendant: DMJ Associates, L.L.C., AKA DMJ Associates, L.L.C.
Def-Third-Party-Plaintiff-Counter-Claimant - Appellee: Exxon Mobil Corporation and Quanta Resource Corporation
Defendant-Counter-Claimant: Clairol, Incorporated, Basf Corporation, Powell Duffryn Terminals, Inc. and others
Third-Party-Plaintiff: Paribas North America
Third-Party-Defendant: EQ Northeast, Inc., AKA Franklin Environmental Services, Inc., FKA Franklin Pumping Service, Coastal Oil New York, Inc, Alcan Aluminum Corporation, AKA Alcan Sheet & Plate and others
Defendant: Carl A. Capasso, Darling International, Inc., Russell W. Mahler and others
City of New York v. Amerada Hess Corp.
as 14-3224
Defendant: Marathon Ashland Petroleum LLC, Leemilt's Petroleum Inc., Motiva Enterprises, LLC and others
Defendant / Appellant: Mobile Corporation, ExxonMobil Oil Corporation and Exxon Mobil Corporation
Plaintiff / Appellee: City of New York, New York City Water Board and New York City Municipal Water Finance Authority
City of New York v. Amerada Hess Corp.
as 14-3224
Plaintiff - Appellee: City of New York, New York City Water Board and New York City Municipal Water Finance Authority
Defendant: Amerada Hess Corp., Atlantic Richfield Company, BP America, Inc. and others
Defendant - Appellant: Exxon Mobil Corporation, Exxon Mobil Oil Corporation and Mobile Corporation

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?