Cases 1 - 10 of 18
PHHHOTO Inc. v. Meta Platforms, Inc.
as 23-763
Plaintiff / Appellant:
PHHHOTO Inc.
Defendant / Appellee:
Meta Platforms, Inc., FKA Facebook, Inc.
Defendant:
DOES NOs. 1-7
Amicus Curiae:
The Committee to Support The Antitrust Laws, Josh Davis, Christopher R. Leslie and others
Confidence Empire, Inc. v. Meta Platforms, Inc.
as 22-997
Plaintiff:
Confidence Empire, Inc.
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Leonel Lops
Defendant / Appellee:
Meta Platforms, Inc.
Defendant:
Facebook, Inc.
Brock v. Zuckerberg
as 21-1796
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Mandela Brock
Defendant / Appellee:
Mark Zuckerberg, in his individual and corporate capacity, Facebook, Inc., Sheryl K. Sandberg, in her individual and corporate capacity and others
Defendant:
John Doe 1-100, in his individual capactiy, Jane Doe 1-100, in her individual capacity and Sean Parker, in his individual and corporate capacity
Brock v. Zuckerberg
as 21-61
Defendant / Appellee:
Facebook, Inc., Mark Zuckerberg, in his individual and corporate capacity and Sheryl K. Sandberg, in her individual and corporate capacity
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Mandela Brock
Defendant:
Jane Doe 1-100, in her individual capacity, Sean Parker, in his individual and corporate capacity, Mark S. Pincus and others
In Re: Kirstjen M. Nielsen
as 17-3345
Petitioner:
Kevin McAleenan, Secretary of Homeland Security, Jefferson B. Sessions III, United States Attorney General, Donald J. Trump, President of the United States and others
Respondent:
Martin Jonathan Batall Vidal, Make the Road New York, Antonio Alarcon and others
Amicus Curiae:
City of Los Angeles, California, City of Austin, Texas, City of Boston, Massachusetts and others
In Re: Elaine Duke
as 17-3345
Petitioner:
Elaine C. Duke, Acting Secretary of Homeland Security, Jefferson B. Sessions III, United States Attorney General, Donald J. Trump, President of the United States and others
Respondent:
Martin Jonathan Batall Vidal, Make the Road New York, Antonio Alarcon and others
Amicus Curiae:
City of Los Angeles, California, City of Austin, Texas, City of Boston, Massachusetts and others
Movant:
6Sense Insights, Inc., A Medium Corporation, Adobe Systems Incorporated and others
In re: Facebook, Inc., IPO Sec
as 14-3800
Plaintiff:
Thomas E. Nelson, individually and behalf of all others similarly situated, Rock Southward, Derivatively on Behalf of Himself &All Others Similarly Situated, Avatar Securities, LLC and others
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Robert Lowinger
Defendant - Appellee:
Goldman, Sachs & Co., Facebook, Inc., a Delaware corporation, Morgan Stanley & Co. LLC and others
Defendant:
Barclays Capital Inc., Merrill Lynch, Pierce, Fenner & Smith Incorporated, BMO Capital Markets Corp. and others
Amicus Curiae:
U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission
In Re: Jomo Williams
as 14-3115
Petitioner:
Jomo Williams
Respondent:
C.J.S., United States Postal Service, Federal Election Committee and others
Defendant:
Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation
In re: Facebook, Inc., IPO Sec
as 14-1788
Plaintiff:
Thomas E. Nelson, individually and behalf of all others similarly situated, Rock Southward, Derivatively on Behalf of Himself &All Others Similarly Situated, Avatar Securities, LLC and others
Plaintiff - Appellee:
William Cole, Derivatively on Behalf of Facebook, Inc.
Defendant:
Barclays Capital Inc., Marc L. Andreessen, Merrill Lynch, Pierce, Fenner & Smith Incorporated and others
Defendant - Appellant:
Facebook, Inc., a Delaware corporation
In re: Facebook, Inc., IPO Sec
as 14-1784
Plaintiff:
Thomas E. Nelson, individually and behalf of all others similarly situated, Rock Southward, Derivatively on Behalf of Himself &All Others Similarly Situated, Avatar Securities, LLC and others
Plaintiff - Appellee:
Lidia Levy, on behalf of herself and all others similarly situated
Defendant:
Barclays Capital Inc., Merrill Lynch, Pierce, Fenner & Smith Incorporated, Erskine B. Bowles and others
Defendant - Appellant:
Facebook, Inc., a Delaware corporation
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
