Cases 1 - 10 of 36
United States of America v. Cameron (USA)
as 24-257
Plaintiff / Appellant:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant / Appellee:
CHRISTOPHER T. DUPONT
Defendant:
ERIN CAMERON, EMMANUEL C. HUMPHREY and MARY KETTLE
United States of America v. Dixon
as 23-6273
Defendant:
HUMPHREY STEWART, Fathead and Priest
Not Yet Classified:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Appellant:
EMILE DIXON
In re: John Jay Humphrey
as 22-1460
Plaintiff / Appellant:
John Jay Humphrey
Defendant / Appellee:
United States District Court for the Northern District of New York
Humphrey v. IRS
as 22-1052
Plaintiff / Appellant:
John Jay Humphrey
Defendant / Appellee:
Internal Revenue Service, United States Government, Justice Northern District of New York and others
In Re: John Jay Humphrey
as 22-235
Petitioner:
John Jay Humphrey
Respondent:
The CDC, Commissioner of Mental Health, Governor Kathy Hochul and others
In Re: John Jay Humphrey
as 21-2977
Petitioner:
John Jay Humphrey
Respondent:
Internal Revenue Service, United States Government, Justice Northern District of New York and others
Kirschner v. JP Morgan Chase Bank, N.A.
as 21-2726
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Marc S. Kirschner, soley in his capacity as Trustee of The Millenium Lender Claim Trust
Defendant / Appellee:
JP Morgan Chase Bank, N.A., JP Morgan Securities LLC, Citibank, N.A. and others
Defendant:
Citibank Global Markets Inc.
United States of America v. Dixon
as 20-3601
Defendant / Appellant:
Emile Dixon
Appellee:
United States of America
Defendant:
Humphrey Stewart, AKA Fathead, AKA Priest
Halladin v. Rosen
as 20-3482
Petitioner:
HUMPHREY H. HALLADIN
Respondent:
JEFFREY A. ROSEN, ACTING UNITED STATES ATTORNEY GENERAL
United States of America v. Robinson
as 20-2969
Defendant:
Marty Humphrey, Lashaunda Tarver, AKA Shaunda, Bobby R. Graham and others
Defendant / Appellant:
Darren Clay Robinson, AKA Mountain, AKA Darren Charles Robinson
Appellee:
United States of America
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
