Cases 1 - 10 of 11
Pena Garcia v. United States Department of Labor
as 23-8066
Petitioner:
LUIS PENA GARCIA
Respondent:
Director, Office of Workers' Compensation Programs UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF LABOR, IMS INSURANCE COMPANY OF PUERTO RICO and CALZADILLA CONSTRUCTION CORPORATION
KM v. Katonah-Lewisboro Union Free S
as 21-2156
Plaintiff / Appellant:
KM, individually, and on behalf of IM, a minor and SM, individually, and on behalf of IM, a minor
Defendant / Appellee:
Katonah-Lewisboro Union Free School District
Squire v. Huntoon, Jr.
as 14-2850
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Percy Squire
Defendant - Appellee:
Lt. Gen. David Huntoon, Jr., Superintendent United States Military Academy and Director of Information Management, United States Military Academy Attn: IMNI-MIL-IM
Marino Institute of Continuing v. Issa
as 14-180
Plaintiff - Appellee:
Marino Institute of Continuing Legal Education, Inc.
Defendant:
Matt Partain, MP Innovations, Inc., IPLS Global and others
Defendant - Appellant:
Omar Issa and Lionyx Solutions Corporation
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 13-2852
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant - Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Jin v. Holder
as 13-1664
Petitioner:
Xing Shu Jin, AKA Song Suk Im, AKA Song Sim
Respondent:
Eric H. Holder, Jr., United States Attorney General
Zhang v. Holder
as 11-4514
Petitioner:
Chunzi Zhang, AKA Young-Im Bang
Respondent:
Eric H. Holder, Jr., United States Attorney General
Duferco S.A. v. Tube City IMS, L.L.C.
as 11-886
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Duferco S.A.
Defendant - Appellee:
Tube City IMS, L.L.C. and R. Kelly Freedman Holdings Group, L.L.C.
Zhang v. Holder
as 11-132
Petitioner:
Chunzi Zhang, AKA Young-Im Bang
Respondent:
Eric H. Holder, Jr., United States Attorney General
Singh v. Well
as 10-4134
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Iqbal Singh and IMS, P.C.
Defendant - Appellee:
Russell G. Wells, James Sherman, John Paris and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
