Cases 1 - 10 of 60
Muzumala v. Unknown Federal Agents
as 24-1267
Plaintiff:
JOSHUA MUZUMALA, -
Defendant:
UNKNOWN FEDERAL AGENTS, JOHN DOE, 1, JOHN DOE, 2 and others
Shomo v. State of New York
as 24-818
Plaintiff:
JOSE SHOMO
Defendant:
STATE OF NEW YORK, DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS AND COMMUNITY SUPERVISION, STEWART ECKERT, Superintendent, individually and in official capacity and others
Patel v. Patel
as 24-194
Plaintiff / Appellant:
The Excellent RAJ K. PATEL, The Excellent, from all capacities
Defendant / Appellee:
NEAL K. PATEL and SANJANA KUMAR
Patel v. Incorporated Village of Old Brookville
as 23-651
Plaintiff / Appellee:
Neal Patel
Defendant:
Incorporated Village of Old Brookville, Old Brookville Village Police Department, Police Officer Michael J. Marino, in his official and individual capacity and others
Defendant / Appellant:
Police Officer William Reavy, in his official and individual capacity
Patel v. Incorporated Village of Old Brookville
as 23-609
Plaintiff / Appellee:
Neal Patel
Defendant:
Incorporated Village of Old Brookville, Old Brookville Village Police Department, Police Officer Thomas Lamb, in his official and individual capacity and others
Defendant / Appellant:
Police Officer Michael J. Marino, in his official and individual capacity
Maucha v. The Bank of New York Mellon
as 23-173
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Paul Maucha
Defendant / Appellee:
The Bank of New York Mellon, FKA The Bank of New York, as Indenture Trustee for CWHEQ and Loan Asset-Backed Notes, Series 2007-E
Defendant:
Countrywide Home Loane, M&T Bank, One M&T Plaza and others
The Phoenix of Albany, LLC v. County of Albany
as 22-3011
Plaintiff / Appellant:
The Phoenix of Albany, LLC
Defendant / Appellee:
County of Albany and Jeffrey Neal, as Director of Albany County Division of Finance
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 22-2937
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
