Cases 1 - 10 of 11
Gibbs v. Utilization Review Committee
as 24-891
Plaintiff:
DAVID GIBBS
Defendant:
CONNECTICUT DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, FEDUS, Dr., PILLAI, Dr. and others
Harnage v. Pillai
as 22-1856
Plaintiff / Appellant:
James A. Harnage
Defendant / Appellee:
Dr. Omprakash Pillai, Lisa Candelario and Robert Bonetti
Defendant:
Dr. Omprekash Pillai, Dr. David Giles, Lisa Caldonero and others
Harnage v. Lightner
as 22-1413
Plaintiff / Appellant:
James A. Harnage
Defendant / Appellee:
Omprakash Pillai
Defendant:
Rikel Lightner, Dr. Wu, Dr. O'Hallaran and others
Harnage v. Furtick
as 19-1663
Plaintiff / Appellant:
James A. Harnage
Defendant / Appellee:
Tawanna Furtick, Heidi Greene, Dr. Syed Naqvi and others
Harnage v. Pillai
as 19-1549
Plaintiff / Appellant:
James A. Harnage
Defendant / Appellee:
Omprakash Pillai
Defendant:
Rob, P.A., Dr. David Giles and Jane Doe
Marshall v. Lightener
as 19-1538
Defendant / Appellee:
Jennifer Jerome, #2, Kevin McCrystal, #3, Omprakash Pillai, #7 and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Charles Marshall
Harnage v. Wu
as 18-2285
Plaintiff - Appellant:
James A. Harnage
Defendant - Appellee:
Vecchairelli, C.N.
Defendant:
Wu, Dr., Correctional Managed Healthcare, Rikel Lightner and others
Harnage v. Lightner
as 18-1559
Plaintiff - Appellant:
James A. Harnage
Defendant - Appellee:
Rikel Lightner, Dr. Wu, Correctional Managed Health Care and others
Benjamin v. Pillai
as 18-545
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Ezra Benjamin
Defendant - Appellee:
Dr. Omprakash Pillai, Rikel Lightner, Heidi, Nurse and others
Navarro v. Murphy et al
as 17-638
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Anthony M. Navarro
Defendant - Appellee:
Murphy, Warden, individual and official capacity, Chapdelaine, Warden, individual and official capacity, Jane Doe, #1, individual and official capacity and others
Defendant:
Hall, Captain, individual and official capacity, Gallagher, Ms., individual and official capacity, Cheryl A. Spano, individual and official capacity and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
