Cases 1 - 10 of 14
Motley v. Janae Rocquel Motley Estate
as 24-1
Plaintiff / Appellant:
JANAE ROCQUEL MOTLEY
Defendant / Appellee:
JANAE ROCQUEL MOTLEY ESTATE, beneficiary JANAE ROCQUEL MOTLEY, DYMARION RASHAD BROOKS ESTATE, beneficiary DYMARION RASHAD BROOKS, DERRION RASHAD BROOKS ESTATE, beneficiary DERRION RASHAD BROOKS and others
Brown v. Blinken
as 22-2918
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Kenneth Anderson Brown, a Moore benefiiciary, and Admiral, mariner, Merchant, Piloter and private people called Moor and subject, consul and Noble of the Al Maroc Shereefian Empire and Kenneth Anderson Brown, a Moore beneficiary, and Admiral, mariner, Merchant, Piloter and private people called Moor and subject, consul and Noble of the Al Maroc Shereefian Empire
Defendant / Appellee:
Antony John Blinken, Secretary of State, United States, Janet Louise Yellen, Secretary of Treasury, United States, Heirs & Assignees, Jo Anne Barnhart, Commissioner, SSA, Heirs & Assignees and others
Wood v. Mutual Redevelopment Houses
as 21-2617
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Tzvee Wood and Andrea Malester
Defendant / Appellee:
Mutual Redevelopment Houses, Inc., Carmen Santiago, in her individual and professional capacity at Mutual, Brendan Keany, in his individual and professional capacity and others
Defendant:
New York City Department of Housing Preservation and Development, Penn South Cooperative Federal Credit Union, Michael Schwartz, Esq., in his individual and professional capacity and others
Wood v. Mutual Redevelopment Houses
as 19-1889
Defendant / Appellee:
Morris Benjamin, in his individual and capacity as President, CEO, and Board member of Mutual, Bette Levine, in her individual and professional capacity as Apartment Allcoations Chairperson and Board member of Mutual, Marc Boddewyn, in his individual and professional capacity at Mutual and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Andrea Malester and Tzvee Wood
Defendant:
John and Jane Doe, s 1-10, New York City Department of Housing Preservation and Development, Joseph Quigley, in his individual and professional capacity at HPD and others
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 14-2554
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant - Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 14-2627
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant - Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Infanti v. Scharpf
as 13-2272
Plaintiff:
Infanti International, Inc.
Plaintiff-Counter-Defendant - Appellant:
Vittorio Infanti
Defendant-Counter-Claimant - Appellee:
George Scharpf, Individually and as Chairman of the Board of Directors & President & CEO of Amboy National Bank a/k/a Amboy Bancorporation
Defendant - Appellee:
George Scharpf Holdings LLC, Stanley Koreyva, Jr., Individually and as Chief Financial Officer & Board member of Amboy National Bank a/k/a Amboy Bancorporation & Senior V.P. of Amboy National Bank, Elizabeth Kavlakian and others
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 12-2341
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant - Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Infanti v. Scharpf
as 12-999
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Infanti International, Inc.
Plaintiff-Counter-Defendant - Appellant:
Vittorio Infanti
Defendant-Counter-Claimant - Appellee:
George Scharpf, Individually and as Chairman of the Board of Directors & President & CEO of Amboy National Bank a/k/a Amboy Bancorporation
Defendant - Appellee:
George Scharpf Holdings LLC, Stanley Koreyva, Jr., Individually and as Chief Financial Officer & Board member of Amboy National Bank a/k/a Amboy Bancorporation & Senior V.P. of Amboy National Bank, Elizabeth Kavlakian and others
Schafler v. HSBC Bank
as 12-679
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Pepi Schafler, JD
Defendant - Appellee:
HSBC Bank, USA, Paul J. Lawrence, President, CEO, Scott D. Miller, HSBC Tower, M & T Bank, Robert J. Wilmers President and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
