Cases 1 - 8 of 8
Henry v. Department of Veteran Affairs
as 21-1716
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Alfred G. Henry
Defendant / Appellee:
Robert A. McDonald, Secretary
Defendant:
Department of Veteran Affairs, Dr. Adam Wolkin, David Matalon, M.D., Staff Psychiatrist and others
McDonald v. Elkholy
as 19-981
Defendant / Appellee:
Ahmed Y. Elkholy
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Robert E. McDonald
Sun v. New York State Attorney Genera
as 17-3697
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Xiu Jian Sun, Servant of The Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-Day Saints; The Spiritual Adam
Defendant - Appellee:
New York State Attorney General, Charles F. Sanders, (Wang Xing Ren), Michael Siudzinski, (Wang Xing Ren) & Office of the Attorney General of NY and others
Kramer v. Shulkin
as 17-2199
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Hyman Kramer
Defendant - Appellee:
Officer Steven Figueroa, Law Enforcement Officer of The United States Department of Veterans Affairs, John Moreno, Law Enforcement officer of the U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs, Dr. Lulla and others
Defendant:
Secretary Robert A. McDonald, Of the United States Department of Veterans Affairs and John Doe
Shaw v. Merit Systems Protection Board
as 17-1122
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Kenneth Daniel Shaw
Defendant - Appellee:
Robert A. McDonald, Secretary of the Department of Veterans Affairs, Acting Director Mara Davis, EMS Chief Terry Vogt and others
Defendant:
Merit Systems Protection Board, New York Office and Judge Maureen Briody
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 17-993
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant - Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
United States of America v. McDonald
as 12-2056
Appellee USA:
United States of America
Defendant - Appellant:
Robert E. McDonald
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 12-1061
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant - Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
