Cases 1 - 10 of 35
Authors Guild v. OpenAI Inc.
as 24-1007
Plaintiff:
AUTHORS GUILD, DAVID BALDACCI, NICHOLAS A. BASBANES and others
Defendant:
MICROSOFT CORPORATION, OPENAI, INC., OPENAI LP and others
Not Yet Classified:
PAUL TREMBLAY, MICHAEL CHABON, TA-NEHISI COATES and others
Alter v. Open AI Inc.
as 24-1016
Plaintiff:
JULIAN SANCTON, on behalf of himself and all others similarly situated, RICH COHEN, JAMES SHAPIRO and others
Defendant:
MICROSOFT CORPORATION, OPENAI, INC., OPENAI GP, LLC and others
Not Yet Classified:
PAUL TREMBLAY, MICHAEL CHABON, TA-NEHISI COATES and others
Betts v. Sixty Lower East Side, LLC
as 23-1289
Plaintiff / Appellee:
Margaret Betts
Defendant / Appellant:
Sixty Lower East Side, LLC, Sixty Hotels, LLC and Sixty Hotel Manager, LLC
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 23-1015
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Counter Claimant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Gazzola v. Hochul
as 22-3068
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Nadine Gazzola, individually, and as coowner, President, and as BATFE Federal Firearms Licensee Responsible Person for Zero Tolerance Manufacturing, Inc., Seth Gazzola, individually, and as coowner, Vice President, and as BATFE FFL Responsible Person for Zero Tolerance Manufacturing, Inc., John A. Hanusik, individually, and as owner and as BATFE FFL Responsible Person for d/b/a AGA Sales and others
Defendant / Appellee:
Kathleen Hochul, in her Official Capacity as Governor of the State of New York, Steven A. Nigrelli, in his Official Capacity as the Acting Superintendent of the New York State Police, Rossana Rosado, in her Official Capacity as the Commissioner of the Department of Criminal Justice Services of the New York State Police and others
The Medical Society of the State of New York v. UnitedHealth Group Inc.
as 22-2702
Plaintiff:
Albert B. Knapp, M.D., P.C., on its own behalf and in the name of his business, which is identical, both directly and as the representative of PATIENT G; and on behalf of all others similarly situated, Dr. Darrick Antell, in the name of his business and on its own behalf, Podiatric OR of Midtown Manhattan, P.C., on its own behalf and on behalf of its patients, and on behalf of all others similarly situated and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
The Medical Society of the State of New York, on behalf of its members, Society of New York Office Based Surgery Facilities, on behalf of its members and Columbia East Side Surgery, P.C., both directly and as the representative of PATIENTS C, D, E and F
Defendant / Appellee:
UnitedHealth Group Inc., United Healthcare Services, Inc., United HealthCare Insurance Company and others
1199 SEIU United Healthcare Workers East v. PSC Community Services
as 22-1587
Petitioner:
1199 SEIU United Healthcare Workers East, National Center for Law and Economic Justice, Legal Aid Society and others
Respondent:
PSC Community Services, New Partners, Inc., DBA Partners in Care, Stella Orton Home Care Agency, Inc. and others
Intervenor:
Mei Kum Chu, Sau King Chung, Qun Xiang Ling and others
Appellant:
Rafaela Cruceta, Virtudes Duran, Wai Kam Lou and others
Jericho Group Ltd v. Mid-Town Development Limited P
as 22-194
Plaintiff:
Jericho Co.
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Jericho Group Ltd
Appellant:
Samuel Pfeiffer
Defendant / Appellee:
Mid-Town Development Limited Partnership, Midtown Development L.P., Edward G. Imperatore and others
Defendant:
WR West Side Associates, Hadrian Properties Ltd., Fanfare Enterprise Inc. and others
In Re: Purdue Pharma L.P.
as 22-96
Petitioner:
Mortimer-Side Initial Covered Sackler Persons
Respondent:
State of California, People of the State of California, by and through Attorney General Rob Bonta, State of Connecticut and others
In Re: Purdue Pharma L.P.
as 22-94
Petitioner:
The Raymond Sackler Family and Raymond Sackler Family/Side B of the Sackler Family
Respondent:
The State of Washington, State of Maryland, District of Columbia and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
