Cases 51 - 60 of 92
Wilson v. ADA Kelly Sessoms-Newton et al
as 1:2014cv00106
Defendant:
ADA Kelly Sessoms-Newton, ADA Scott Kessler, District Attorney Richard A. Brown and others
Plaintiff:
Theodore O. Wilson, III
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Paige-Bey v. City of New York et al
as 1:2013cv07300
Defendant:
Darren Albanese, Michael Bloomberg, City of New York and others
Plaintiff:
Zaire Paige-Bey
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Lloyd v. McAvoy et al
as 1:2013cv06849
Defendant:
Gregory Clarke, Police Commissioner Raymond Kelly, P.O. Michael McAvoy and others
Plaintiff:
Charles Lloyd
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Lloyd v. McAvoy et al
as 1:2013cv06542
Defendant:
P.O. Gregory Clarke, Commissioner Raymond Kelly, Michael McAvoy and others
Plaintiff:
Charles Lloyd
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Lloyd v. McAvoy et al
as 1:2013cv06210
Defendant:
P.O. Gregory Clarke, Raymond Kelly, Michael McAvoy and others
Plaintiff:
Charles Lloyd
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Henderson v. Doe et al
as 1:2013cv05738
Defendant:
113th Precinct, John Doe, Chandra Gomes and others
Plaintiff:
Todd Henderson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Holmes v. Kelly et al
as 1:2013cv03122
Defendant:
Det. Michael Centrone, John/Jane Doe, Commissioner Raymond Kelly and others
Plaintiff:
Henry Holmes
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Giannone v. Kelly
as 2:2013cv02877
Petitioner:
Jonathan Giannone
Respondent:
Eileen Kelly
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Kelly v. Tryon
as 1:2012cv05756
Petitioner:
Courtney Kelly
Respondent:
Todd Tryon
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Kelly v. United States of America
as 1:2012cv05106
Petitioner:
Jonathan Kelly
Respondent:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
