Cases 21 - 30 of 31
Frederick v. City of New York et al
as 1:2013cv00897
Defendant:
Robert Abraham, Michael Bloomberg, Derrick Boyd and others
Plaintiff:
John Frederick
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Holt v. United States Marshals Service et al
as 1:2013cv00469
Defendant:
Federal Bureau of Prisons, U.S. Marshal Craig Moravicw and United States Marshals Service
Plaintiff:
Shelton Holt
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1346 Tort Claim
Shelton v. Merck & Co., Inc et al
as 1:2013cv00160
Defendant:
Merck & Co., Inc and Merck Sharpe & Dohme Corp.
Plaintiff:
Paul B. Shelton
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Shelton v. Dynamic Recovery Services, Inc.
as 1:2012cv06023
Defendant:
Dynamic Recovery Services, Inc.
Plaintiff:
Catherine Shelton
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Akines et al v. SmithKline Beecham Corporation et al
as 1:2012cv00612
Plaintiff:
Brenda Akines, Regina Banks, Lesslie Bishop and others
Defendant:
John Does 1 through 3 and SmithKline Beecham Corporation
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal
Whitely v. New York City et al
as 1:2011cv05794
Defendant:
New York City, Richard D. Shelton and Gerald Williams
Plaintiff:
Damone Whitely
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2011cv05336
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Willis v. United States of America
as 1:2011cv02188
Respondent:
United States of America
Petitioner:
Shelton Willis
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
Conger v. Greyhound Lines, Inc. et al
as 1:2010cv02662
Plaintiff:
Shirley Conger
Defendant:
Greyhound Lines, Inc. and Shelton Jones
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Petition for Removal
Shelton v. Turk Hava Yolari A.O.
as 1:2009cv00308
Plaintiff:
Shawn Shelton
Defendant:
Turk Hava Yolari A.O.
Cause Of Action: Diversity
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
