Cases 41 - 50 of 52
Kugler v. Potter
as 1:2011cv00648
Defendant:
Postmaster General Patrick R Donahue and John E. Potter
Plaintiff:
Raina Kugler
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights (Employment Discrimination)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2010cv05318
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 451 Employment Discrimination
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2010cv04835
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 551 Administrative Procedure Act
Ramos v. The City of New York et al
as 1:2010cv04466
Defendant:
P.O. "Jane Doe" and "John Doe" 1-10 and The City of New York
Plaintiff:
Donahue Ramos
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2010cv04006
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 0701 jr Judicial Review
Montoya et al v. New York State United Teachers et al
as 2:2010cv02068
Defendant:
Lee Cutler, Jane Doe Defendants 1-99, John Doe Defendants 1-99 and others
Plaintiff:
Betsabe Montoya and Blanche Pesce
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 77 Securities Fraud
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2009cv03538
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Pettus v. Mangano et al
as 1:2009cv01454
Plaintiff:
James Pettus
Defendant:
Mangano, Jr., Milo, Fischer and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Black et al v. City of New Yok et al
as 1:2008cv04007
Plaintiff:
Tyshawn Black, Barry Limehouse and Leah Foster
Defendant:
City of New Yok, Raymond W. Kelly, Martin F. Horn and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Lawrence v. The City of New York et al
as 1:2008cv03756
Plaintiff:
Anthony Lawrence
Defendant:
The City of New York, Jeremy DeMarco, Thomas Donahue and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
