Cases 1 - 10 of 40
Stokes et al v. Slayton et al
as 5:2024cv00499
Plaintiff:
Shane T. Stokes, Sr. and Susan C. Johnson
Defendant:
James Slayton, Roger Anthony, Matthew Androsko and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv00322
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 American Disabilities Act
Sitts et al v. County of Saratoga et al
as 1:2023cv01649
Plaintiff:
Lisa Santore, Roger Sitts, Wayne Roberts and others
Defendant:
County of Saratoga and Andrew Jarosh
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 6:2023cv01464
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 6:2023cv01254
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 American Disabilities Act
In Re: Megan A. Rogers
as 5:2022pf00004
In Re:
Megan A. Rogers
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Rogers v. McMahon et al
as 5:2022cv00994
Plaintiff:
Megan Rogers
Defendant:
Ryan McMahon, City Planning and Aquarium
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Rogers v. Benedict et al
as 5:2022cv00801
Plaintiff:
Megan Rogers
Defendant:
Michael Benedict, Rudolph Sohl, Sara Sohl and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Bedore v. Lind
as 8:2022cv00473
Plaintiff:
David H. Bedore
Defendant:
Roger Lind
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Rogers v. U.S. Department of the Treasury, et al
as 5:2021cv01351
Plaintiff:
Megan A. Rogers, Jebo, Hubert Rogers and others
Defendant:
U.S. Department of the Treasury, U.S. Department of Treasury - IRS, Marcus Rogers and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
