Cases 1 - 10 of 122
Richards v. D. Barnes #823 et al
as 9:2024cv00321
Plaintiff:
Darius Richards, Benjamin Munson, Anthony Major and others
Defendant:
D. Barnes #823, Kim Salm Inmate Coordinator, Lieutenant Michael Slack #125 and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Ware v. Boutin et al
as 9:2024cv00143
Plaintiff:
Khyrel Ware
Defendant:
Boutin, John Doe #1, John Doe #2 and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Clarke v. Azar et al
as 9:2023cv01193
Plaintiff:
Nigel Clarke
Defendant:
Alex Azar, II, Kathy C. Hochul, Howard C. Zucker and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Shoga v. Stanton et al
as 9:2023cv00891
Plaintiff:
Alex Shoga and Alex R. Shoga, Jr.
Defendant:
Dave Stanton, Adam Wilcox, Jon Gillette and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Allah v. Lawson et al
as 9:2023cv00785
Plaintiff:
Jaiquan Allah
Defendant:
Ryan Lawson, Aragona, Stratta and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Adams v. The Willows et al
as 9:2023cv00698
Plaintiff:
James E. Adams
Defendant:
The Willows and Onondaga County
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Crampton v. Lilley
as 9:2023cv00226
Petitioner:
Adam C. Crampton
Respondent:
Superintendent Lilley
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Cottell v. Koenigsmann et al
as 9:2023cv00217
Plaintiff:
Adam Cottell
Defendant:
Koenigsmann, John Morley, M.D., Susan Mueller and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Rainey v. Luther et al
as 9:2023cv00027
Plaintiff:
Jamarr Rainey
Defendant:
Deputy Luther, Mayyo, Joyce and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Adams v. Lilly
as 9:2022cv01038
Petitioner:
Quinton Adams
Respondent:
Lynn Lilly
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
