Cases 91 - 100 of 252
Jones v. Monroe County Jail Medical Dept.
as 6:2018cv06813
Plaintiff:
Wendyl Lamont Jones
Defendant:
Monroe County Jail Medical Dept.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 6:2018cv06528
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e
Tabak v. Monroe County Broadcasting Company, Limited
as 6:2018cv06542
Defendant:
Monroe County Broadcasting Company, Limited
Plaintiff:
Alec Tabak
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 101
Arieno v. County of Monroe et al
as 6:2018cv06509
Defendant:
County of Monroe and Monroe County Sheriff's Department
Plaintiff:
Joseph J. Arieno
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
Williams v. The People of the State et al
as 6:2018cv06458
Plaintiff:
Don Williams
Defendant:
The People of the State, Monroe Police Department, Judge Ramses and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Yoo v. Rochester General Hospital et al
as 6:2018cv06398
Plaintiff:
James W. Yoo
Defendant:
Rochester General Hospital, Monroe County Sheriff's Office and Stephanie Scroger Yoo
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Fulton v. Monroe County Supreme Court
as 6:2018cv06386
Plaintiff:
Alvin Fulton
Defendant:
Monroe County Supreme Court
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
McIntosh v. Monroe County, NY et al
as 6:2018cv06304
Plaintiff:
John A. McIntosh
Defendant:
Monroe County, NY, John Doe 1, John Doe 2 and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981
Goodlow v. Monroe County Jail et al
as 6:2018cv06088
Plaintiff:
Selwyn Goodlow
Defendant:
Monroe County Jail, Corporal Second Shift 3-11 on 10/27/2017 4:30pm, Deputy on Duty 3-11 pm West High on 10/27/2017 and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Smith v. Costello et al
as 6:2017cv06759
Petitioner:
Robert E. Smith, Jr.
Defendant:
Costello, Patrick M. O'Flynn and Monroe County Jail
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
