Cases 21 - 30 of 321
Jones v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 6:2023cv06289
Plaintiff:
Rebecca Lee Jones
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 6:2023cv06287
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights (Employment Discrimination)
Jones v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 6:2023cv06265
Plaintiff:
Rufus Jones
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 205 Denial Social Security Benefits
Lukasik v. Annucci et al
as 1:2023cv00394
Plaintiff:
Joshua James Lukasik
Defendant:
Anthony J. Annucci, Mr. Gerard Jones and Letitia James
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Roberts v. Barnwell et al
as 6:2023cv06243
Plaintiff:
Chavana Roberts
Defendant:
Ruth Barnwell, Christopher McClary, Q'asia Evans and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Jones v. Free & Accepted Masons
as 6:2023cv06143
Plaintiff:
Tedric K. Jones
Defendant:
Free & Accepted Masons, L3 Harris Communications and Level 3 Communications
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Jones v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 1:2023cv00186
Plaintiff:
Clarissa Marie Jones
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv00173
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Jones v. Monroe County et al
as 6:2023cv06097
Plaintiff:
Alonzo Jones and AJ
Defendant:
Monroe County, Deputy Nermin Hazmic and Deputy Mary Wegman
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Jones v. Kellogg Sales Company
as 1:2023cv00049
Plaintiff:
Dameka Jones
Defendant:
Kellogg Sales Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Fraud
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
