Cases 31 - 40 of 71
Ocasio et al v. City of Canandaigua et al
as 6:2018cv06712
Defendant:
Dawn Anderson, John and Jane Doe #1 and #2, Pinnacle North I LLC and others
Plaintiff:
Alysa Ocasio, Jahaira Holder and Andrew Ocasio
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Shomo v. State of New York et al
as 1:2018cv00916
Defendant:
Cluadia Mott, Karl Fougerson, Jane Hyland and others
Plaintiff:
Jose Shomo
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Lainez v. New York State Department of Corrections et al
as 6:2018cv06379
Plaintiff:
Roger Lainez
Defendant:
New York State Department of Corrections, Andrew M. Cuomo, State of New York and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Brewer v. John Doe 1 et al
as 1:2018cv00537
Plaintiff:
Kenneth Brewer
Defendant:
John Doe 1, Maloy, Frederick and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
McIntosh v. Monroe County, NY et al
as 6:2018cv06304
Plaintiff:
John A. McIntosh
Defendant:
Monroe County, NY, John Doe 1, John Doe 2 and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981
Smith v. Annucci et al
as 6:2018cv06261
Plaintiff:
Lemuel Smith
Defendant:
Anthony J. Annucci, James O'Gorman, Joseph Bellnier and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Deodat v. Immigration Custom and Enforcement et al
as 6:2017cv06867
Plaintiff:
Karran Deodat
Defendant:
Immigration Custom and Enforcement, Department of Homeland Security, Akeim Global Services and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Tracey v. City of Geneva et al
as 6:2017cv06567
Plaintiff:
Joseph Tracey
Defendant:
City of Geneva, Ron Alcock, Jeffrey Trickler and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Perez v. Artus et al
as 1:2017cv00418
Plaintiff:
Carlos Perez
Defendant:
Dale Artus, Jane/Doe 1 and Jane/Doe 2
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Allen v. Correctional Medical Care, Inc. et al
as 6:2016cv06734
Plaintiff:
Homer Allen
Defendant:
Correctional Medical Care, Inc., County of Monroe, Monroe County Sheriff's Office and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
