Cases 51 - 60 of 91
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2014cv00372
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Andino v. Lamy et al
as 1:2014cv00054
Plaintiff:
Luis Andino
Defendant:
Fredrick Lamy, Frances Sullivan, Thomson Reuters and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Murphy v. The City of Rochester et al
as 6:2009cv06068
Plaintiff:
Donald F. Murphy
Defendant:
The City of Rochester, The City of Rochester School District, William C. Cala and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2013cv00493
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Life Insurance Company of North America v. Murphy
as 6:2013cv06190
Plaintiff:
Life Insurance Company of North America
Defendant:
Rose Marie Murphy, John Does 1-5 and Jane Does 1-5
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1345 USA Plaintiff
Murphy v. Chemung County Library District et al
as 6:2012cv06533
Plaintiff:
Christopher M. Murphy
Defendant:
Chemung County Library District, Board of Trustees of the Chemung County Library District, Steel Memorial Library and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Ramadan v. Sheeran et al
as 6:2012cv06519
Plaintiff:
Abdul S. Ramadan
Defendant:
Thomas J. Sheeran, Matthew J. Murphy, Mary E. Davis and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 6:2012cv06280
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 20 U.S.C. § 1080
Murphy v. Astrue
as 6:2012cv06271
Petitioner:
Connie Lynne Murphy
Respondent:
Michael J. Astrue
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 205
Evans v. Murphy et al
as 1:2012cv00365
Plaintiff:
Shawn Evans
Defendant:
P. Murphy, G. Reppert, S. Davis and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
