Cases 1 - 10 of 697
Higgins v. Martuscello, III. et al
as 1:2024cv00901
Plaintiff:
Tony Higgins
Defendant:
Superintendent Leanne Latona, Daniel F. Martuscello, III. and John Does 1-10
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Brown et al v. Hochul et al
as 6:2024cv06555
Defendant:
Patrick McKeage, Ben Sheridan, Temaine Wright and others
Plaintiff:
Triclomes LLC, John P Brown, Sniper Inc and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Coniglio v. Matruscello et al
as 1:2024cv00896
Defendant:
Daniel F. Matruscello, III, John Does 1-5, Sgt. Merta and others
Plaintiff:
Justice Coniglio
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Calhoun v. Dabney et al
as 1:2024cv00872
Defendant:
The City Of Buffalo, New York, Phillip Dabney, Jr., Jospeh Pazkiewicz and others
Plaintiff:
Dominique C. Calhoun
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Paris Foods Corporation v. Assured Edge Solutions, LLC et al
as 6:2024cv06543
Plaintiff:
Paris Foods Corporation
Defendant:
Assured Edge Solutions, LLC and Daniel Rao
Cause Of Action: 07 U.S.C. § 499 Agricultural Commodities Act
Miller v. Suess et al
as 1:2024cv00772
Defendant:
Daniel L. Greenwald, Amanda Suesi and Anthony Suess
Plaintiff:
Mujihad Miller
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Anderson v. Tarantino
as 6:2024cv06482
Defendant:
Daniel J. Tarantino
Plaintiff:
Derrick Anderson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Daniels v. Cayuga Correctional Facility
as 6:2024cv06477
Plaintiff:
Akeem Daniels
Defendant:
Cayuga Correctional Facility
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Murray v. Schunk et al
as 1:2024cv00708
Defendant:
Dr Williams, Dr Schunk, NY DOCCS and others
Plaintiff:
Daniel Murray
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Anderson v. Anderson et al
as 6:2024cv06463
Plaintiff:
Derrick M. Anderson
Defendant:
Harvey C. Anderson, Jr. and Daniel J. Tarantino
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
