Cases 1 - 10 of 10
Young v. Norris
as 6:2020cv06960
Plaintiff:
James O. Young
Defendant:
James P. Norris
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Borders El Bey v. Brown et al
as 6:2017cv06678
Plaintiff:
Michael Borders El Bey
Defendant:
Byron Brown, Daniel Derenda, Robert Danner and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Wells v. Colvin et al
as 6:2016cv06850
Plaintiff:
Michael James Wells
Defendant:
J. Colvin, Bryan Norris and Robert Shields
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Norris v. The Memory Lane Motel et al
as 1:2016cv00982
Plaintiff:
Mario Norris
Defendant:
The Memory Lane Motel and Ray
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Benitez v. Salotti et al
as 6:2016cv06219
Plaintiff:
Henry Benitez
Defendant:
K. Salotti, T. Jenkins, K. Reynolds and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Norris v. Colvin
as 1:2014cv00874
Plaintiff:
Michael Norris
Defendant:
Carolyn W. Colvin
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 205
Norris et al v. DePuy Orthopaedics, Inc. et al
as 6:2014cv06359
Plaintiff:
John Norris and Denise Norris
Defendant:
DePuy Orthopaedics, Inc., DePuy, Inc., Johnson & Johnson and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Hart et al v. Crab Addison, Inc. d/b/a Joe's Crab Shack et al
as 6:2013cv06458
Defendant:
Crab Addison, Inc. d/b/a Joe's Crab Shack , Ignite Restaurant Group, Inc. , Raymond A. Blanchette, III and others
Plaintiff:
Christopher Hart , Jeffrey Beyer , Maria Sargent and others
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
Norris v. The City Of Rochester, et al
as 6:2013cv06100
Plaintiff:
John L Norris
Defendant:
The City Of Rochester, Officer Robinson and John Doe Supervisors #1-5
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Washington et al v. The African Methodist Episcopal Church, Inc. et al
as 6:2011cv06087
Plaintiff:
Marlowe V.N. Washington and Elmira Washington
Defendant:
The African Methodist Episcopal Church, Inc. and Richard Franklin Norris
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
