Cases 91 - 100 of 1,448
Murdock v. Rosen et al
as 3:2023cv00063
Plaintiff:
Jason Alain Murdock
Defendant:
Scott D. Rosen, Cohn Birnbaum and Shea PC, Wilmington Savings Fund Society, FSB and others
134 Coventry LLC v. U.S. Bank Trust, N.A.
as 1:2023cv00181
Plaintiff:
134 Coventry LLC
Defendant:
U.S. BANK TRUST, N.A., AS TRUSTEE FOR THE LSF9 MASTER PARTICIPATION TRUST and U.S. Bank Trust, N.A.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity Action
Prince v. Jackson et al
as 3:2023cv00017
Plaintiff:
Bridgitte Prince
Defendant:
Chester Jackson, Ursula Jackson, Melvin Jackson and others
Baldera v. Nationstar Mortgage LLC et al
as 1:2022cv07965
Plaintiff:
Jorge Baldera
Defendant:
Nationstar Mortgage LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1446 Notice of Removal
Robbins v. Bank of America National Association
as 1:2022cv07648
Plaintiff:
Eric Robbins
Defendant:
Bank of America National Association
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Notice of Removal
Oneida Indian Nation v. Phillips
as 22-3130
Plaintiff:
Oneida Indian Nation
Counter Claimant:
Melvin L. Phillips, Sr., individually and as trustee and Melvin L. Phillips, Sr./Orchard Party Trust
Wilson v. Williams
as 3:2022cv01583
Plaintiff:
Tadjwid Wilson
Defendant:
Bruce J. Williams C.E.O. doing business as Newrez LLC doing business as Shellpoint Mortgage Services
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2201 Declaratory Judgment
1257 ABP LLC v. Deutsche Bank National Trust Company
as 1:2022cv07369
Plaintiff:
1257 ABP LLC and Deutsche Bank National Trust Company, As Trustee of The Residential Asset Securitization Trust 2006-AC
Defendant:
Deutsche Bank National Trust Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Petition to Quiet Title
Fried v. CIT Bank, N.A.
as 1:2022cv07376
Plaintiff:
Aron, as Trustee of the Seiden Family Estate Trust Fried
Defendant:
CIT Bank, N.A.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Petition to Quiet Title
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
