Cases 91 - 100 of 172
Sun v. New York State Attorney Genera
as 17-3697
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Xiu Jian Sun, Servant of The Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-Day Saints; The Spiritual Adam
Defendant - Appellee:
New York State Attorney General, Charles F. Sanders, (Wang Xing Ren), Michael Siudzinski, (Wang Xing Ren) & Office of the Attorney General of NY and others
Kirschenbaum v. ASSA Corporation
as 17-3682
Petitioner - Appellee:
Jason Kirschenbaum, Isabelle Kirschenbaum, on her own behalf and as Executrix of the Estate of Martin Kirschenbaum, Joshua Kirschenbaum and others
Plaintiff - Appellee:
Fiona Havlish, individually and on behalf of the Estate of Donald G. Havlish, Jr., et al., Estate of Donald J. Havlish, Jr., Donald G. Havlish, Sr. and others
Respondent:
650 Fifth Avenue Company and Alavi Foundation
Respondent - Appellant:
ASSA Corporation and ASSA Co., Ltd.
Kirschenbaum v. ASSA Corporation
as 17-3278
Petitioner - Appellee:
Jason Kirschenbaum, Isabelle Kirschenbaum, on her own behalf and as Executrix of the Estate of Martin Kirschenbaum, Joshua Kirschenbaum and others
Plaintiff - Appellee:
Fiona Havlish, individually and on behalf of the Estate of Donald G. Havlish, Jr., et al., Estate of Donald J. Havlish, Jr., Donald G. Havlish, Sr. and others
Respondent:
ASSA Corporation and ASSA Co., Ltd.
Respondent - Appellant:
650 Fifth Avenue Company and Alavi Foundation
Sun et al v. State of New York Office of the Attorney General et al
as 1:2017cv05916
Defendant:
109 Precinct and 2 Female Enforcement Police Officers from 109 Precinct, Alfonse D'Amato Federal Courthouse, Attorney Generals Office of Eric T. Schneiderman and others
Pharisee:
Akwei Oko Acquaye, Aprilanne Agostino, Thomas P. Aliotta and others
Wang Xing Ren:
Aron M. Bloom, Daniele Dezago, Sean P. Greene and others
Wand Xing Ren:
Robert L. Capers
Plaintiff:
Xiu Jian Sun
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Donohue v. Madison
as 17-2417
Plaintiff:
John Dellio, Individually and on behalf of all others similarly-situated, Michael Bouleris, Individually and on behalf of all others similarly-situated, Maureen Alonzo, Individually and on behalf of all others similarly-situated and others
Petitioner:
Thomas J. Madison, Jr., Individually and in his official capacity as Executive Director of the New York State Thruway Authority and the New York State Canal Corporation, Carlos Milan, Individually and in his official capacity as Director of Employee Relations and Employee Safety, New York State Thruway Authority and New York State Canal Corporation, Brian U. Stratton, Individually and in his official capacity as Director of the New York State Canal Corporation and others
Respondent:
Danny Donohue, as President of the Civil Service Employees Association, Inc., Local 1000, AFSCME, AFL-CIO, Civil Service Employees Association, Local 1000 AFSCME, AFL-CIO, William Coleman, individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated and others
Donohue v. Madison
as 17-2415
Petitioner:
Thomas J. Madison, Jr., Individually and in his official capacity as Executive Director of the New York State Thruway Authority and the New York State Canal Corporation, Carlos Millan, in his official capacity as Director of Employee Relations and Employee Safety, New York State Thruway Authority and New York State Canal Corporation, Howard P. Milstein, Individually and in his official capacity as Chairman of New York State Thruway/Canal Corporation Board of Directors and others
Respondent:
Danny Donohue, as President of the Civil Service Employees Association, Inc., Local 1000, AFSCME, AFL-CIO, Civil Service Employees Association, Local 1000 AFSCME, AFL-CIO, John Dellio, Individually and on behalf of all others similarly-situated and others
Tafari v. Baker
as 17-1971
Petitioner:
Injah Tafari
Respondent:
Candice Baker, Jennifer Brink, Zebra Cicconi-Crozier and others
Ontario Teachers' Pension Plan Board, et al v. Teva Pharmaceutical Industries Ltd. et al
as 3:2017cv00558
Plaintiff:
Galmi, Amram Galmi, Anchorage Police & Fire Retirement System and others
Defendant:
Teva Pharmaceutical Industries Ltd, Deborah Griffin, BBVA Securities, Inc. and others
Consolidated Plaintiff:
Franklin Investors Securities Trust, Franklin Templeton Investments Corp., Franklin Templeton Investment Funds and others
Interested Party:
East 71, Ltd., Brahman Partners II, L.P., Brahman Partners III, L.P. and others
Petitioner:
Waterford Township Police and Fire Retirement System, Barry Baker, Public School Teachers Pension and Retirement System of Chicago and others
Consolidated Defendant:
Shlomo Yanai, Yitzhak Peterburg, Yaacov Altman and others
Intervenor:
United States of America and HMG Global Initiative Inc.
Intervenor Plaintiff:
Certain funds and accounts managed by TIAA-CREF Investment Management LLC and Teachers Advisors LLC, TIAA-CREF Investment Management LLC, TIAA-CREF Investment Management LLC on behalf of certain of its managed funds and accounts and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 78
Trenton Business Assistance Corporation v. O'Connell et al
as 2:2017cv01607
Defendant:
Thomas Dinapoli, Incorporated Village of Freeport, New York, Beaumont Jefferson and others
Plaintiff:
Trenton Business Assistance Corporation
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Doe v. Ejercito de Liberacion Naciona
as 17-759
Plaintiff - Appellant:
John Doe
Def-Third-Party-Plaintiff-Counter-Claimant - Appellee:
JP Morgan Chase Bank, N.A.
Third-Party-Defendant:
American Life Insurance Company, incorrectly pleaded as "Metropolitan Life Insurance Company", Alico Life Insurance Company, Lebanon Branch, improperly pleaded as "Metropolitan Life Insurance Company", Estate of Donald J. Havlish, Jr. and others
Defendant - Appellee:
Deutsche Bank Trust Company, of America and Commerzbank AG, New York Branch
Defendant:
Ejercito de Liberacion National, AKA ELN, National Liberation Army and Fuerza Armadas Revolucionarios de Colombia, AKA FARC, Standard Chartered Bank and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
