Cases 11 - 20 of 108,005
In Re: Motion to Quash Kroger Company Subpoena to United Food and Commercial Workers, Local 400
as 1:2024mc00245
Cause Of Action: M 08-85 Motion to Quash
SecurityScorecard, Inc. v. Safe Securities, Inc. et al
as 1:2024cv04240
Plaintiff:
SecurityScorecard, Inc.
Defendant:
Safe Securities, Inc. doing business as Safe Security and Mary Polyakova
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv04014
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act
Olney v. County of Onondaga
as 5:2024cv00742
Plaintiff:
Christine H. Olney
Defendant:
County of Onondaga
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Commodity Futures Trading Commission v. Alexandre
as 24-1493
Plaintiff:
UNITED STATES COMMODITY FUTURES TRADING COMMISSION and ABC
Intervenor:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant:
EDDY ALEXANDRE, DEF and EMINIFX INC.
Receiver:
DAVID A CASTLEMAN, Temporary Receiver, as Court-Appointed Receiver
The People of the State of New York v. Arm or Ally, LLC
as 24-1497
Petitioner:
ARM OR ALLY, LLC, BLACKHAWK MANUFACTURING GROUP, INC., AKA 80 PERCENT ARMS, INC., AKA 80 PERCENT ARMS, SALVO TECHNOLOGIES, INC.., AKA 80P BUILDER, AKA 80P FREEDOM CO. and others
Respondent:
THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK, by Letitia James, Attorney General of the State of New York
Intervenor:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Lin v. Garland
as 24-1514
Petitioner:
DONG LIN
Respondent:
MERRICK B. GARLAND, UNITED STATES ATTORNEY GENERAL
Diakite v. U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services
as 24-1505
Petitioner:
FATOUMATA DIAKITE
Respondent:
UNITED STATES CITIZENSHIP AND IMMIGRATION SERVICES, (USCIS)
Kenneson v. Parker
as 24-1504
Plaintiff:
KIMBERLY A. KENNESON
Defendant:
DONALD PARKER, ROBERT MILSLAGLE and JAMES DANIELS
Jones v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 24-1506
Plaintiff:
BETH JONES
Defendant:
COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
