Cases 1 - 10 of 12
Energetic Tank, Inc. v. Unknown Defendant
as 22-2881
Plaintiff / Appellee:
Energetic Tank, Inc., as Owner of the M/V Alnic MC, for exoneration from or Limitation of Liability
Appellant:
Francesco Sanfilippo and Alexis Sanfilippo
Counter Claimant:
Navin Ramdhun, Haruka Ramdhun, Jason Luangco and others
Claimant:
Kerrington Harvey, Jason Baldwin, Matthew Montgomery and others
Defendant:
Unknown Defendant
Energetic Tank, Inc. v. Unknown Defendant
as 22-2883
Plaintiff / Appellee:
Energetic Tank, Inc., as Owner of the M/V Alnic MC, for exoneration from or Limitation of Liability
Appellant:
Philip Torio, Phillip Fields, James Andy Woods and others
Counter Claimant:
Navin Ramdhun, Haruka Ramdhun, Jason Luangco and others
Claimant:
Jennifer Simon, United States of America, Joshua Bruce Hook and others
Defendant:
Unknown Defendant
Energetic Tank, Inc. v. Unknown Defendant
as 22-2871
Plaintiff / Appellee:
Energetic Tank, Inc., as Owner of the M/V Alnic MC, for exoneration from or Limitation of Liability
Appellant:
Mr. Doyle A Ebarb, Joseph K. Robbins, Ashanti Molton and others
Counter Claimant:
Navin Ramdhun, Francesco Sanfilippo, Carmelo Castro and others
Claimant:
Kerrington Harvey, Jason Baldwin, Matthew Montgomery and others
Defendant:
Unknown Defendant
Energetic Tank, Inc. v. Unknown Defendant
as 22-2774
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Energetic Tank, Inc., as Owner of the M/V Alnic MC, for exoneration from or Limitation of Liability
Counter Claimant:
Navin Ramdhun
Defendant / Appellee:
Unknown Defendant
Appellee:
Haruka Ramdhun, Jason Luangco, Cheysserr Luangco and others
Claimant:
Kerrington Harvey, Jason Baldwin, Matthew Montgomery and others
Energetic Tank, Inc. v. Unknown Defendant
as 22-1884
Plaintiff:
Energetic Tank, Inc., as Owner of the M/V Alnic MC, for exoneration from or Limitation of Liability
Appellant:
United States of America
Counter Claimant:
Navin Ramdhun
Claimant:
Brandon Tolley
Appellee:
Haruka Ramdhun, Jason Luangco, Cheysserr Luangco and others
Defendant / Appellee:
Unknown Defendant
Energetic Tank, Inc. v. Unknown Defendant
as 22-1765
Appellant:
Energetic Tank, Inc., as Owner of the M/V Alnic MC, for exoneration from or Limitation of Liability
Counter Claimant:
Navin Ramdhun
Claimant:
Brandon Tolley
Appellee:
Haruka Ramdhun, Jason Luangco, Cheysserr Luangco and others
Grover v. Lindblad Expeditions, LLC et al
as 1:2021cv01741
Defendant:
Lex Quest, LLC, Lindblad Expeditions, LLC, Lindblad Expeditions, Inc. and others
Plaintiff:
Simone F. Grover
Cause Of Action: 46 U.S.C. ยง 30104
In Re: City of New York
as 12-885
Plaintiff:
Saul Bienenfeld, Estate of Bagarozza
Respondent:
Carlos M. Calderon and Richard S. Weisman
Not Yet Classified:
Public Administrator for the County of Queens as Administrator of the Estate of Guierllermo Paguay
3Rd Party Defendant:
The M/V Andrew Barberi, its engines and boilers in rem, re: Third Party Claim of J. McMillan, Jr. v. Iris Weinshall. See doc # 194., John Doe, #6, AKA Deckhand Number 7 on the M/V Andrew Barberi, John Doe, #3, re: Third Party Claim of J. McMillan, Jr. v. Iris Weinshall. See doc # 194., AKA Deckhand Number 4 on the M/V Andrew Barberi and others
Claimant:
Theresa Klingele, Vito Oronzo Caputo, Reava Seymour and others
Defendant / Appellee:
Kelly Garigliano, John Scott Thompson, Richard Smith, Detective, re: Third Party Claim of J. McMillan, Jr. v. Iris Weinshall. See doc # 194. and others
Defendant:
Jose Paguay and Richard Godosky, Attorney
Appellee:
Paul Flecker, Torgan & Cooper, P.C., Daniel Ennis and others
Defendant / Appellant:
Bosco, Bisignano & Mascolo
Appellant:
Dougherty, Ryan, Giuffra, Zambito & Hession
In Re: City of New York
as 12-885
Plaintiff:
Saul Bienenfeld, Estate of Bagarozza
Respondent:
Carlos M. Calderon and Richard S. Weisman
Third-Party-Plaintiff:
Public Administrator for the County of Queens as Administrator of the Estate of Guierllermo Paguay
Third-Party-Defendant:
The M/V Andrew Barberi, its engines and boilers in rem, re: Third Party Claim of J. McMillan, Jr. v. Iris Weinshall. See doc # 194., John Doe, #6, AKA Deckhand Number 7 on the M/V Andrew Barberi, John Doe, #3, re: Third Party Claim of J. McMillan, Jr. v. Iris Weinshall. See doc # 194., AKA Deckhand Number 4 on the M/V Andrew Barberi and others
Claimant:
Theresa Klingele, Vito Oronzo Caputo, Reava Seymour and others
Defendant:
Jose Paguay and Richard Godosky, Attorney
Defendant - Appellee:
Kelly Garigliano, John Scott Thompson, Richard Smith, Detective, re: Third Party Claim of J. McMillan, Jr. v. Iris Weinshall. See doc # 194. and others
Appellee:
Paul Flecker and Torgan & Cooper, P.C.
Claimant - Appellee:
Philip Garigliano, Rasika Dias, Joan Thompson and others
Defendant - Appellant-Cross-Appellee:
Bosco, Bisignano & Mascolo
Appellant-Cross-Appellee:
Dougherty, Ryan, Giuffra, Zambito & Hession
Appellee-Cross-Appellant:
Daniel Ennis and William Greenwood
In Re: City of New York
as 12-687
Plaintiff:
Saul Bienenfeld, Estate of Bagarozza
Respondent:
Carlos M. Calderon and Richard S. Weisman
Appellant:
Dougherty, Ryan, Giuffra, Zambito & Hession
Third-Party-Plaintiff:
Public Administrator for the County of Queens as Administrator of the Estate of Guierllermo Paguay
Third-Party-Defendant:
The M/V Andrew Barberi, its engines and boilers in rem, re: Third Party Claim of J. McMillan, Jr. v. Iris Weinshall. See doc # 194., John Doe, #6, AKA Deckhand Number 7 on the M/V Andrew Barberi, John Doe, #3, re: Third Party Claim of J. McMillan, Jr. v. Iris Weinshall. See doc # 194., AKA Deckhand Number 4 on the M/V Andrew Barberi and others
Claimant:
Theresa Klingele, Vito Oronzo Caputo, Reava Seymour and others
Defendant:
Richard Godosky, Attorney and Jose Paguay
Defendant - Appellee:
Kelly Garigliano, John Scott Thompson, Richard Smith, Detective, re: Third Party Claim of J. McMillan, Jr. v. Iris Weinshall. See doc # 194. and others
Appellee:
Paul Flecker and Torgan & Cooper, P.C.
Claimant - Appellee:
Philip Garigliano, Daniel Ennis, Rasika Dias and others
Defendant - Appellant:
Bosco, Bisignano & Mascolo
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
