Cases 1 - 10 of 126
Palladino v. JPMorgan Chase & Co.
as 23-1031
Plaintiff / Appellant:
John Palladino, Garib Karapetyan, Steve Palladino and others
Defendant / Appellee:
JPMorgan Chase & Co., JPMorgan Chase Bank N.A., Bank of America Corporation and others
Palladino et al v. JPMorgan Chase & Co. et al
as 1:2023cv01215
Plaintiff:
John Palladino, Garib Karapetyan, Steve Palladino and others
Defendant:
JPMorgan Chase & Co., JPMorgan Chase Bank N.A., Bank of America Corporation and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Petition for Removal
Contant v. Bank of America Corporation
as 22-159
Plaintiff / Appellee:
James Contant, on behalf of themselves and all others similarly situated, Martin-Han Tran, on behalf of themselves and all others similarly situated, Carlos Gonzalez, on behalf of themselves and all others similarly situated and others
Petitioner / Appellant:
AMA Capital Management, LLC
Defendant:
Bank of America Corporation, Bank of America, N.A., Merrill Lynch, Pierce, Fenner & Smith Inc. and others
Petitioner:
FXDirectDealer, LLC (FXDD)
Contant v. Bank of America Corporation
as 22-19
Plaintiff / Appellee:
James Contant, on behalf of themselves and all others similarly situated, Martin-Han Tran, on behalf of themselves and all others similarly situated, Carlos Gonzalez, on behalf of themselves and all others similarly situated and others
Petitioner / Appellant:
AMA Capital Management, LLC
Defendant:
Bank of America Corporation, Bank of America, N.A., Merrill Lynch, Pierce, Fenner & Smith Inc. and others
Petitioner:
FXDirectDealer, LLC (FXDD)
Board of Directors of the San Diego Association of Governments, acting as the San Diego County Regional Transportation Commission v. Bank of America Corporation et al
as 1:2021cv04893
Defendant:
Citigroup Global Markets Inc., J.P. Morgan Securities LLC, Wachovia Bank, N.A. and others
Plaintiff:
Board of Directors of the San Diego Association of Governments, acting as the San Diego County Regional Transportation Commission
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1
Pizzabov, Inc. et. al. v. Visa International Service Association et. al.
as 2:2020cv01517
Defendant:
Capital One Bank, (USA), N.A., Bank of America Corp., Visa International Service Assocation and others
Plaintiff:
1SaleADay, Octagon Commerce, LLC, East New York Kosler, Corp. and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 25 Clayton Act
Mayor and City Council of Baltimore v. Bank of America Corporation et al
as 1:2019cv02667
Defendant:
Citigroup Global Markets Inc., J.P. Morgan Securities LLC, Wachovia Bank, N.A. and others
Plaintiff:
Mayor and City Council of Baltimore
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1
Hawaii Sheet Metal Workers Health & Welfare Fund et al v. Intercontinental Exchange, Inc. et al
as 1:2019cv02002
Defendant:
Lloyds Securities Inc., Citigroup Global Markets Inc., BNP Paribas SA and others
Plaintiff:
Hawaii Sheet Metal Workers Training Fund, Hawaii Sheet Metal Workers Pension Fund, Hawaii Sheet Metal Workers Health & Welfare Fund and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1
The City of Philadelphia v. Bank of America Corporation et al
as 1:2019cv01608
Defendant:
Citigroup Global Markets Inc., Wachovia Bank, N.A., Wells Fargo Bank, N.A. and others
Plaintiff:
The City of Philadelphia, City of Philadelphia and San Diego Association of Governments
Consolidated Defendant:
Fifth Third Securities, Inc., BMO Financial Corp., BMO Financial Group and others
Consolidated Plaintiff:
Mayor and City Council of Baltimore
Interested Party:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1 Antitrust Litigation (Monopolizing Trade)
City of Livonia Employees' Retirement System et al v. Intercontinental Exchange, Inc. et al
as 1:2019cv00965
Defendant:
Lloyds Securities Inc., Citigroup Global Markets Inc., BNP Paribas SA and others
Plaintiff:
City of Livonia Retiree Health and Disability Benefits Plan and City of Livonia Employees' Retirement System
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
