Cases 21 - 28 of 28
Nelson v. American Brokers Conduit et al
as 3:2015cv01233
Plaintiff:
Moses Nelson
Defendant:
American Brokers Conduit, Mortgage Electronic Registry Systems , U.S. Bank, N.A. and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Bromfield v. Lend-Mor Mortgage Bankers Corp. et al
as 3:2015cv01103
Plaintiff:
Lenora Bromfield
Defendant:
Lend-Mor Mortgage Bankers Corp., Mortgage Electronic Registry Systems , Bank of America, N.A. and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Smythe v. Select Portfolio Servicing Inc. et al
as 1:2014cv02820
Defendant:
Mortgage Electronic Registration System, Rosicki Rosicki and Associates, P.C., Select Portfolio Servicing Inc. and others
Plaintiff:
Percy Smythe
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Mass et al v. Countrywide Home Loans, Inc. et al
as 1:2013cv07202
Plaintiff:
Alan Mass and Arlene Mass
Defendant:
Countrywide Home Loans, Inc., CSMC Mortgage-Backed Trust 2007-2, U.S. Bank National Association and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2201
Sanders v. U.S. Bank N.A. et al
as 1:2013cv06963
Plaintiff:
Tina M. Sanders
Defendant:
U.S. Bank N.A., JP Morgan Chase Bank, McCalla Raymer, L.L.C. and others
Cause Of Action: 31 U.S.C. § 3729
Lucca v. GMAC Mortgage, LLC et al
as 1:2012cv06342
Defendant:
GMAC Mortgage, LLC and U.S. Bank National
Plaintiff:
Maria Yolanda Lucca
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Capurso v. Bank & Banking et al
as 1:2012cv02698
Plaintiff:
Victor Frederick Leo Capurso
Defendant:
Bank & Banking, U.S., Corporations, Offering Products & Services, to consumers, at all named of Banks & Holding, Companies, Capital One Bank (USA), N.A. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Beckles v. U.S. Bank National Association et al
as 1:2010cv01937
Plaintiff:
Andre Beckles
Defendant:
John Doe #1 through John Doe #3 and U.S. Bank National Association
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
