Cases 1 - 10 of 20
Arce v. Chautauqua Family Court
as 23-105
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Armando Arce, Sr.
Defendant / Appellee:
David L. Turnbull, individually and in his official capacity, Chautauqua County Family Court, official capacity, Michael K. Bobseine, Official capacity and others
Defendant:
Chautauqua Family Court
Corrado v. State of New York University S
as 16-2938
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Christopher Corrado
Defendant - Appellee:
State of New York University Stony Brook Police, State of New York University Hospital, Reuven Pasternick, Individually and others
Defendant:
Officer John Doe, Officer John Doe and Officer John Doe
Sonny B. Southerland, Sr. v. Timothy Woo
as 14-3780
Plaintiff:
Ciara M. and Emmanuel Felix
Plaintiff - Appellee:
Sonny B. Southerland, Sr., Venus Southerland, Sonny B. Southerland, Jr. and others
Defendant:
City of New York, Rudolph W. Giuliani, Individually & As Mayor Of The City Of New York, Fred Levitan, Individually & As Regional Director Of The New York City Regional Office Of Children &Family Services (NYCOCFS) and others
Defendant - Appellant:
Mr. Timothy Woo, Individually & As ACS Caseworker
Neroni v. Coccoma
as 14-3359
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Frederick J. Neroni
Defendant - Appellee:
Ellen L. Coccoma, individually and as a former member of the Committee for Professional Conduct, Appellate Division, Third Judicial Department, Hinman, Howard & Kattell, LLP, a Binghamton law firm, Michael V. Coccoma, individually and as the Deputy Chief Administrative Judge in charge of Upstate New York courts and others
Neroni v. Peebles
as 14-3000
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Tatiana Neroni
Defendant - Appellee:
David E. Peebles, individually and in his capacity as U.S. Magistrate Judge, the U.S. District Court, Northern District of New York, Matthew Holmes, individually and in his capacity as judicial extern for David E. Peebles, Gary L. Sharpe, individually and in his capacity as Chief Judge, the U.S. District Court, Northern District of New York and others
Neroni v. Coccoma
as 14-2381
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Frederick J. Neroni
Defendant - Appellee:
Michael V. Coccoma, individually and as the Deputy Chief Administrative Judge in charge of Upstate New York courts, A. Gail Prudenti, individually and as the Chief Administrative Judge of Upstate New York, Robert Mulvey, individually and as Chief Administrative Judge, 6th Judicial District and others
Kastle v. Town of Kent
as 14-1352
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Barbara B. Kastle, Individually and as Joint Administrators of the Estate of Michael W. Kastle, Deceased and Matthew L. Kastle, Individually and as Joint Administrators of the Estate of Michael W. Kastle, Deceased
Defendant - Appellee:
Vincent E. Bade, Town of Kent, Individually, Town of Kent, New York, Chris Tompkins, Town of Kent and others
Nolen v. City of Barre
as 13-4513
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Wallace S. Nolen
Defendant - Appellee:
City of Barre, Vermont, Thomas Lauzon, individually and official capacity as Mayor of the City of Barre, John Craig, individually and official capacity as former City Manager of the City of Barre and others
L. H. v. County of Livingston
as 13-4344
Plaintiff - Appellee:
L. H., individually, and as parent and guardian of T.D. and T.D.
Defendant - Appellant:
County of Livingston, Thomas E. Moran, Individually and in his official capacity as former District Attorney of Livingston County and Lindsay P. Quintilone, Individually and in her official capacity as former Assistant District Attorney of Livingston County and other known or unknown employees of the County of Livingston
Manko v. Steinhardt
as 12-4156
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Nella Manko
Defendant - Appellee:
Marsha L. Steinhardt, individually and in her official capacity as Judge of the Supreme Court of Kings County, Garson Decorato & Cohen, LLP, in its individual and professional capacities, Anna R. Schwartz, Esq., in her individual and professional capacities and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
