Cases 1 - 10 of 85
40 Acres & 1 Mule, LLC v. Network Solutions, LLC
as 23-1252
Plaintiff / Appellant:
40 Acres & 1 Mule, LLC, on behalf of themselves and all others similarly situated and Go Score, LLC, on behalf of themselves and all others similarly situated
Defendant / Appellee:
Network Solutions, LLC, Web.com Group, Inc, New Ventures Services Corp. and others
Ferrari et al. v. Cuomo et al.
as 1:2023cv07715
Plaintiff:
JOSEPH FERRARI, as Administrator of the Estate of CHRISTINE FERRARI, LEOVA JENKINS, as Administrator of the Estate of ELOISE BROOKS, IRASEMA RIVERA, as Administrator of the Estate of PAUL RIVERA and others
Defendant:
Ex-Governor ANDREW M. CUOMO, HOWARD A. ZUCKER, MELISSA DEROSA and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Uviles v. City of New York
as 23-903
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Joel Uviles, on behalf of himself and all others similarly situated,
Defendant / Appellee:
The City of New York and Anthony J. Annucci, Acting Commissioner for the New York State Department of Corrections and Community Supervision, in his official capacity,
Mejia et al v. County of Rockland et al
as 7:2023cv00492
Plaintiff:
Rene Alvarado Mejia and All Others Similarly Situated
Defendant:
County of Rockland, New York Unified Court System, Donna G. Siberman and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 cv Fed. Question: Other Civil Rights
Hanks v. City of Syracuse
as 22-2819
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Brandon Hanks, and other similarly situated individuals
Defendant / Appellee:
City of Syracuse, Kenton Buckner, In his individual capacity, Deputy Chief Richard Trudell, In his individual capacity and others
Defendant:
Does 1-100
Jeffery v. City of New York
as 22-2745
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Lamel Jeffery, On Behalf of Himself and Others Similarly Situated, Thaddeus Blake, On Behalf of Himself and Others Similarly Situated and Chayse Pena, On Behalf of Himself and Others Similarly Situated
Defendant / Appellee:
City of New York, Eric Adams, Mayor of New York City, Individually and in his Official Capacity, Bill De Blasio, individually and others
Defendant:
Kathy Hochul, Governor of the State of New York, Individually and in her Official Capacity and P.O.s John Doe #1-50, Individually and in their Official Capacity, (the name John Doe being fictitious, as the true names are presently unknown)
Baker v. Broadcast Music Incorporated
as 22-1997
Plaintiff:
Adam Bravery LLC, All other similarly situated Royalty Assignees
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Alexander C Baker, All other similarly situated Songwriters
Defendant / Appellee:
Broadcast Music Incorporated, AKA BMI
Kane v. de Blasio
as 22-1876
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Michael Kane, individually, and for all others similarly situated, William Castro, individually, and for all others similarly situated, Margaret Chu, individually, and for all others similarly situated and others
Appellant:
Matthew Keil, John De Luca, Dennis Strk and others
Defendant / Appellee:
Eric Adams, in his official capacity as Mayor of the City of New York, David Chokshi, in his official capacity of Health Commissioner of the City of New York and New York City Department of Education
New Yorkers For Religious Liberty, Inc. v. The City of New York
as 22-1801
Plaintiff / Appellant:
New Yorkers For Religious Liberty, Inc., Gennaro Agovino, Curtis Cutler and others
Defendant / Appellee:
City of New York, Eric Adams, Dave Chokshi, in his official capacity as Health Commissioner of the City of New York and others
Defendant:
Roberta Reardon
Appellant:
Matthew Keil, John De Luca, Dennis Strk and others
Oles v. City of New York
as 22-1620
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Ward Oles, individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated and Patricia Reed, individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated
Defendant / Appellee:
City of New York, acting through the New York City Police Department and New York City Department of Finance, Mary Gotsopoulis and Jeffrey Shear
Defendant:
Jane and John Does 1-10
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
