Cases 1 - 10 of 4,401
Navarro v. Moreno-Cuevas et al
as 3:2024cv01524
Defendant:
Jane Doe, John Doe and Ramon Moreno-Cuevas
Plaintiff:
John Navarro
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442 Notice of Removal
Inman v. Kullgren et al
as 3:2024cv01495
Defendant:
Travis Kullgren and Jameson Zaluski
Plaintiff:
Wesley Charles Inman
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Kniffin v. Frazier et al
as 3:2024cv01489
Plaintiff:
Jon Kniffin
Defendant:
Abigail Frazier, Kristen Hunt and Patrick Clohessy
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Cruz v. Carabetta Company
as 3:2024cv01488
Defendant:
Carabetta Company
Plaintiff:
Carmen Cruz
Cause Of Action: No cause code entered
Cruz v. Children and Families Department
as 3:2024cv01491
Plaintiff:
Carmen Cruz
Defendant:
Children and Families Department
Cause Of Action: No cause code entered
Dajani v. State of Connecticut et al
as 3:2024cv01460
Defendant:
State of Connecticut, Scott M. Joes doing business as Judge Scott M. Joes, Alexandre Rua doing business as Marshal Alexandre Rua and others
Plaintiff:
Alket Dajani
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1343 Violation of Civil Rights
Gordon et al v. Aetna Life Insurance Company
as 3:2024cv01447
Defendant:
Aetna Life Insurance Company
Plaintiff:
Binah Gordon, S. N. and Kay Mayers
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Molampy v. Frank Pepe's Development Company, LLC et al
as 3:2024cv01453
Defendant:
Pepe's of Danbury, LLC, Pepe's of Montgomery, LLC, Pepe's of Fairfield, LLC and others
Plaintiff:
Stephen Molampy
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 621 Job Discrimination (Age)
Chambers v. State of Connecticut et al
as 3:2024cv01454
Defendant:
City of Hartford C.I. and State of Connecticut
Plaintiff:
Roy C Chambers
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Hines v. Givan
as 3:2024cv01457
Plaintiff:
Marquese Hines
Defendant:
Earl Givan
Cause Of Action: No cause code entered
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
