Cases 11 - 17 of 17
Seneca Nation of Indians v. Amerisourcebergen Drug Corporation et al
as 1:2018cv00620
Plaintiff:
Seneca Nation of Indians
Defendant:
Amerisourcebergen Drug Corporation, Cardinal Health, Inc., McKesson Corporation and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1961
County of Oneida, New York v. Purdue Pharma, L.P. et al
as 6:2018cv00314
Plaintiff:
County of Oneida, New York
Defendant:
Janssen Pharmaceutica Inc., Mallinckrodt, LLC, John Doe and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1961 Racketeering (RICO) Act
County of Onondaga, New York v. Purdue Pharma, L.P. et al
as 5:2018cv00100
Defendant:
Janssen Pharmaceutica Inc., Mallinckrodt, LLC, McKesson Corporation and others
Plaintiff:
County of Onondaga, New York
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1961 Racketeering (RICO) Act
Teamster Local 237 Retirees' Benefit Fund, et al v. Purdue Pharma L.P., et al
as 1:2018cv00336
Defendant:
Purdue Pharma L.P., Purdue Pharma Inc., The Purdue Frederick Company, Inc. and others
Plaintiff:
Teamsters Local 237 Retirees' Benefit Fund and Teamsters Local 237 Welfare Fund
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1961
Teamsters Local 671 Health Services and Insurance Plan v. Purdue Pharma, LP et al
as 3:2017cv02093
Plaintiff:
Teamsters Local 671 Health Services and Insurance Plan
Defendant:
Purdue Pharma, LP, Purdue Pharma Inc., Purdue Frederick Company, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1961
IBEW Local 90 Benefits Plan v. Purdue Pharma, LP et al
as 3:2017cv02095
Plaintiff:
IBEW Local 90 Benefits Plan
Defendant:
Purdue Pharma, LP, Purdue Pharma Inc., Purdue Frederick Company, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1961
The County of Orange v. Abbott Laboratories, Inc.
as 1:2007cv02777
Plaintiff:
The County of Orange, The County of Orange and The County of Orange
Defendant:
Abbott Laboratories, Inc., Abbott Laboratories, Inc., Agouron Pharmaceuticals, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1962 Racketeering (RICO) Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
