Cases 1 - 10 of 18
Jacks Egg Farm, Inc. et al v. GMTC Food Services, LLC et al
as 1:2023cv00965
Plaintiff:
Jacks Egg Farm, INC., D/B/A Jack's Egg Farm and Other Ingredients LLC, Jacob Neustadt, Mordecai Neustadt and others
Defendant:
GMTC Food Services, LLC, Danny Jordan, ABC Global Resources USA, LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1964 Racketeering (RICO) Act
JACKS EGG FARM, INC., D/B/A JACKS EGG FARM AND OTHER INGREDIENTS LLC, et al v. GMTC FOOD SERVICES, LLC, et al
as 1:2023cv00942
Plaintiff:
JACKS EGG FARM, INC., D/B/A JACKS EGG FARM AND OTHER INGREDIENTS LLC,, JACOB NEUSTADT, MORDECAI NEUSTADT and others
Defendant:
GMTC FOOD SERVICES, LLC,, DANNY JORDAN, BC GLOBAL RESOURCES USA, LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1964 Racketeering (RICO) Act
Akhmed Gadzhievich v. Herman Gref
as 22-2671
Plaintiff:
ABC
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Akhmed Gadzhievich Bilalov, an individual
Defendant / Appellee:
Herman Gref, Sberbank CIB USA, Inc. and Sberbank of Russia PJSC
Defendant:
DEF, Kirill Androsov and Does 1-100
Geiss v. The Weinstein Company Holdings
as 21-1011
Plaintiff:
Melissa Thompson, Nannette Klatt, individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated, Sara Ann Thomas, individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated, AKA Sarah Ann Masse and others
Defendant / Appellee:
Nancy Ashbrooke, Richard Koenigsberg, Miramax Film NY, LLC and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Larissa Gomes, Melissa Sagemiller, individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated, Nannette May, FKA Nannette Klatt and others
Defendant:
Miramax Film Corp. and Miramax, LLC
Geiss v. The Weinstein Company Holdings
as 21-1007
Plaintiff:
Melissa Thompson, Nannette Klatt, individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated, Sara Ann Thomas, individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated, AKA Sarah Ann Masse and others
Defendant / Appellee:
Nancy Ashbrooke, Richard Koenigsberg, Miramax Film NY, LLC and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Larissa Gomes, Melissa Sagemiller, individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated, Nannette May, FKA Nannette Klatt and others
Defendant:
Miramax Film Corp. and Miramax, LLC
Cyganowski, et al v. Beechwood Re Ltd. et al
as 1:2018cv12018
Defendant:
Senior Health Insurance Company of Pennsylvania, Beechwood Bermuda Ltd., BRE WNIC 2013 LTC Primary and others
Plaintiff:
Melanie L. Cyganowski, as Equity Receiver for Platinum Partners Credit Opportunities Master Fund LP, Platinum Partners Credit Opportunity Fund (BL) LLC, Platinum Partners Credit Opportunities Fund (TE) LLC and others
3Rd Party Plaintiff:
Washington National Insurance Company and Bankers Conseco Life Insurance Company
3Rd Party Defendant:
PB Investment Holdings Ltd., Beechwood Trust No. 19, Beechwood Trust No. 9 and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1961
Trott et al v. Platinum Management (NY) LLC et al
as 1:2018cv10936
Defendant:
Estate of Uri Landesman, FCBA Trust, Michael Katz and others
Plaintiff:
Platinum Partners Value Arbitrage Fund L.P. (In Official Liquidation), Martin Trott, Christopher Smith and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1961
Geiss et al v. The Weinstein Company Holdings LLC et al
as 1:2017cv09554
Defendant:
James Dolan, Richard Koenigsberg, John Does 1-50 and others
Plaintiff:
Melissa Sagemiller, Louisette Geiss, Nannette Klatt and others
Not Classified By Court:
Rowena Chiu, Wedil David, Dominique Huett and others
Interested Party:
Miriam Haley
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1962 Racketeering (RICO) Act
Stewart et al v. Lake et al
as 1:2016cv02684
Defendant:
Lake, Marianne Lake, Robert Bentley and others
Plaintiff:
Stewart, Ellie Stewart, Janette P. Bowen and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Guerrera Tooker v. Guerrera et al
as 2:2015cv02430
Defendant:
Child Protective Services, David DeRosa, Directional Lending LLC and others
Plaintiff:
Marie Guerrera Tooker
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1961 Racketeering (RICO) Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
