Cases 1 - 10 of 80
Martin v. Shanley
as 1:2023cv11149
Plaintiff:
SHAUN MARTIN
Defendant:
RAYMOND SHANLEY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Ross v. United States of America
as 1:2023cv07760
Petitioner:
Martin Ross
Respondent:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 fd Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Zangrilli v. McCauliffe
as 9:2022cv01359
Petitioner:
Gregory Martin Zangrilli
Respondent:
Chris Sweet and Brian McCauliffe
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Pedro v. United States of America
as 1:2022cv09387
Petitioner:
Martin Selwyn Pedro
Respondent:
Warden M. Starr and UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 fd Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Hobbs v. McIntosh
as 1:2022cv02283
Petitioner:
Martin Hobbs
Respondent:
Superintendent Donita McIntosh and Donita McIntosh
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Carillo v. Superintendent of Greenhaven Correctional Facility
as 1:2022cv00206
Petitioner:
Martin Carillo
Respondent:
Superintendent of Greenhaven Correctional Facility
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Zangrilli v. Sweet
as 9:2021cv01361
Petitioner:
Gregory Martin Zangrilli
Respondent:
The People of the State of New York and Chris Sweet
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Hodge v. United States (BOP)
as 1:2020cv10474
Petitioner:
Martin Hodge
Respondent:
United States (BOP)
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 fd
Croom v. Royce
as 1:2020cv03571
Respondent:
Martin Royce
Petitioner:
Sharif Croom
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Hudson v. Coveny
as 9:2020cv00210
Petitioner:
Martinous Hudson
Respondent:
Anthony J. Annucci and Raymond Coveny
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
