Cases 101 - 110 of 339
Davis v. Whillheim et al
as 1:2017cv05793
Plaintiff:
Kent Davis
Defendant:
Erica Whillheim, Cynthia Arreola, Amy B. Milano and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Young v. Felicano et al
as 3:2017cv01226
Plaintiff:
Javon Young
Defendant:
Felicano, Jr., Pataky, Dawson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Drayton v. Young et al
as 1:2017cv05440
Plaintiff:
Frank Samuel Drayton
Defendant:
William Young, Jr., Michael Davis, George Lopez and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Davis v. Giles
as 3:2017cv01176
Plaintiff:
Curtis Davis
Defendant:
Charleton Giles
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Davis v. Whillheim et al
as 1:2017cv05383
Plaintiff:
Kent Davis
Defendant:
Erica Whillheim, Cynthia Arreola, Amy B. Milano and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Council v. Chapdelaine et al
as 3:2017cv01161
Plaintiff:
Isaac M. Council
Defendant:
Chapdelaine, Davis, Pillai Omprakash and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Shabazz v. Semple et al
as 3:2017cv01136
Plaintiff:
Shaka Shabazz
Defendant:
Scott Semple, Cheryl Cepelak, Monica Ellison and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Davis v. Annucci
as 17-1955
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Falon B. Davis
Defendant - Appellee:
Mr. Anthony J. Annucci, Acting Commissioner, Department of Corrections and Community Supervision, Paul Gonyea, Superintendent, Mohawk Correctional Facility and L. Burns, ORC, Mohawk Correctional Facility
Defendant:
Letricia McCleary, Parole Area Supervisor, John Williams, Parole Officer and James Ogle, Senior Parole Officer
Jones v. Semple et al
as 3:2017cv00994
Plaintiff:
Generio Travis Jones, Jr
Defendant:
Scott Semple, John Doe, Rivera and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Lyons v. Davis et al
as 1:2017cv04504
Plaintiff:
Daevon Raymone Lyons
Defendant:
William Davis, Otis Cruz, Arnold Hamilton and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
