Cases 11 - 20 of 21
Curry v. Valentine et al
as 1:2017cv01319
Plaintiff:
Michael Curry
Defendant:
Captain McDonald, Warden Scott and C.O. Valentine
Interested Party:
Office of the Corporation Counsel of the City of New York
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Winkfield v. Lee
as 1:2014cv01329
Petitioner:
Curry Winkfield
Respondent:
William A. Lee
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Curry v. Bradt et al
as 1:2013cv00355
Plaintiff:
Jerome Curry
Defendant:
Mark L. Bradt and William Hughes
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Crawford v. United States of America
as 12-3943
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Lawrence L. Crawford
Defendant - Appellee:
United States of America, Sovereign State, Kingdom of Saudi Arabia, Sovereign State, Great Britain, Sovereign State and others
Curry v. Sposato et al
as 2:2012cv01031
Plaintiff:
Ernest Curry
Defendant:
John Doe, John Doe and Michael Sposato
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Crawford v. United States et al
as 9:2011cv01437
Plaintiff:
Lawrence L. Crawford
Defendant:
United States, Kingdom of Saudi Arabia, Great Britain and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Curry v. Schneiderman
as 11-76
Plaintiff - Appellant:
James Curry
Defendant - Appellee:
Eric T. Schneiderman, Attorney General, New York State, Robert Dennison, Chairman of Parole, Thomas Spota, District Attorney, Suffolk County and others
Abreu v. Romero
as 10-4827
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Ernesto Abreu
Defendant - Appellee:
Anthony Romero, Detective, Shield # 05726, Alfred Hernandez, Detective, Shield # 5046, John Doe, P.O. and others
Seeley v. Buehart et al
as 6:2010cv06570
Plaintiff:
James Seeley
Defendant:
Sandra Buehart, Victoria Duell, FHSD and Malcolm Curry
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Curry v. Rao et al
as 1:2010cv00616
Plaintiff:
Jerome Curry
Defendant:
Jadow Rao, R. Killinger and Jennifer Wrest
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
