Cases 11 - 20 of 777
Foster v. State of Connecticut
as 3:2024cv00773
Plaintiff:
Hassan Foster and Jose Ramos
Defendant:
State of Connecticut, Office of the Attorney General, States Attorney's Office and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Petteway v. Parsons et al
as 3:2024cv00763
Plaintiff:
Christopher Q. Petteway
Defendant:
Parsons, Yasdel Moya, Landolina and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Breton v. Doe et al
as 3:2024cv00713
Plaintiff:
Randy Breton, Sr
Defendant:
John Doe and Jane Doe
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Gray v. Rogers et al
as 3:2024cv00690
Plaintiff:
Bennie Gray, Jr
Defendant:
Cornelius Rogers, Knotts, John Doe and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Ruldock v. Doe
as 3:2024cv00668
Plaintiff:
Brinsley Ruldock and Brinsley C. Ruldock
Defendant:
John Doe
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Shand v. Burgos et al
as 3:2024cv00570
Plaintiff:
Christopher Shand
Defendant:
Ruben Burgos, Mark Bounaventure, Jamal Linen and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Radice v. Doe et al
as 3:2024cv00531
Plaintiff:
Radice
Defendant:
John Doe and Waterbury Police Department
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Cook v. Mastroianni et al
as 3:2024cv00426
Plaintiff:
Andrew Cook
Defendant:
James Mastroianni, Scott Meikle, Ryan Froehlich and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Aaron v. USA et al
as 3:2024cv00387
Plaintiff:
Paul Aaron
Defendant:
USA, John H. Garcia, Amos D. Telo and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
Jordan v. Department of Corrections et al
as 3:2024cv00259
Plaintiff:
Victor Lamond Jordan, Sr.
Defendant:
Department of Corrections, Angel Quiros, Washington and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
