Cases 1 - 10 of 28
Saeli v. Price et al
as 6:2023cv06661
Plaintiff:
Samuel J. Saeli
Defendant:
Dave Price, Village of Fredonia NY, Brad Meyers and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Warren-Bey v. Gilzean et al
as 1:2023cv08510
Plaintiff:
Jamahn Warren-Bey
Defendant:
Ronnie Gilzean, Melanie Coleman and Brad Lander
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Burrell v. DOCCS et al
as 9:2022cv00702
Plaintiff:
Ako K. Burrell
Defendant:
DOCCS, Anthony Annucci, Central Office and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Dixon v. Doe et al
as 9:2019cv00778
Defendant:
Mr. Enser, Nancy Doe, Brad Barnes and others
Plaintiff:
Christopher Dixon
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Douglas v. Miller et al
as 9:2017cv00833
Plaintiff:
Shonyeah Douglas
Defendant:
Christopher L. Miller, John Doe Construction Company #1, John Doe Construction Company #2 and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Saeli v. WDOE 1410 am radio et al
as 6:2017cv06440
Plaintiff:
Samuel J. Saeli
Defendant:
WDOE 1410 am radio, Alan Bishop, George Kimble and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Saeli v. WGRZ-News Channel 2 et al
as 6:2017cv06441
Plaintiff:
Samuel J. Saeli
Defendant:
WGRZ-News Channel 2, Tegena, Inc., The unknown CEO's of WGRZ & Tegna, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Saeli v. WIVB-TV et al
as 6:2017cv06442
Plaintiff:
Samuel J. Saeli
Defendant:
WIVB-TV, WNLO-YV, Nexstar Media Group and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Dorlette v. Dave Butkiewicu
as 13-3495
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Faroulh Dorlette
Defendant - Appellee:
Dave Butkiewicus, Individual &Official Capacity, Jeffrey McGill, Individual &Official Capacity, Brad Guertin, Individual &Official Capacity and others
Tafari v. Uhler
as 13-2205
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Injah Tafari
Defendant - Appellee:
Donald Uhler, Deputy Superintendent, Stanley Tulip, C.O., Darin Cook, C.O. and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
