Cases 1 - 8 of 8
Jones v. Hochul et al
as 9:2023cv00720
Plaintiff:
Daniel Jones
Defendant:
Kathlee C. Hochul, Letitia James, Ann Marie T. Sullivan and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Jones v. Westchester County et al
as 9:2021cv00572
Defendant:
Dr. Jane Doe, Captain Hermans, Westchester County and others
Plaintiff:
Daniel Jones
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Jones v. McGrath et al
as 1:2020cv01417
Defendant:
Cate, Roy P. Snyder, James Thompson and others
Plaintiff:
Daniel Jones
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Jones v. Cuomo et al
as 9:2019cv00025
Defendant:
Dr. Tankerslery, Danielle Tope, Patricia M. Bordonaro and others
Plaintiff:
Daniel Jones
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Jones v. Cuomo
as 17-3551
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Daniel Jones
Defendant - Appellee:
Andrew M. Cuomo, New York State Govenor, Sandy Hamlin, Adminstrative Assistant, Donna Hall, Acting Associate Commissioner, Office of Mental Health and others
Defendant:
Eric T. Schneiderman, New York State Attorney General, Multi-Disciplinary Staff, Office of Mental Health, Records Coordinator, Fishkill Correctional Facility, Department of Corrections and Community Supervision and others
Jones v. Cuomo et al
as 1:2016cv00771
Plaintiff:
Daniel Jones
Defendant:
Andrew M. Cuomo, Erie T. Schneiderman, Brian Fischer and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Jones v. Sedita
as 16-3210
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Daniel Jones
Defendant - Appellee:
Frank A. Sedita, III, Erie County District Attorney, John Simich, Director of the Erie County Central Police Services Laboratory, Daniel Derenda, Commissioner of the Buffalo Police Department and others
Jones v. Sedita et al
as 1:2016cv00398
Plaintiff:
Daniel Jones
Defendant:
Frank A. Sedita, III, John Simich, Daniel Derenda and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
