Cases 11 - 20 of 28
Cameron-Graham v. City Of New York , et al
as 1:2018cv08906
Defendant:
Supervisor C.O. John/Jane Doe # 1-2, Warden John/Jane Doe # 1, C.O. John/Jane Does #1-10 and others
Plaintiff:
Cindra Cameron-Graham
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Hong v. Aigle et al
as 1:2018cv08110
Plaintiff:
Brandon Hong
Defendant:
C.O. Aigle and Security Captain Graham
Interested Party:
CITY OF NEW YORK
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Brown et al v. Department of Corrections et al
as 1:2016cv07610
Plaintiff:
Candace Brown, Tonya Hanner and Carla Scott
Defendant:
Department of Corrections, D.C. Diaz, Warden Delgrosso and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
D'Angelo v. Annucci et al
as 1:2016cv06459
Plaintiff:
Guido D'Angelo
Defendant:
Anthony Annucci, Ann Mary T. Sullivan, Gilbert Taylor and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Morgan v. Baird et al
as 1:2014cv07921
Plaintiff:
Johnny Morgan
Defendant:
Maureen P. Baird, Michael Ward, E. Green and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Fleming et al v. Kindler et al
as 1:2014cv06288
Plaintiff:
Robert Fleming, James D. Garlick, Tyrone Wenth and others
Defendant:
Kindler, Robert T. Johnson, Clancy and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Graham v. The New York City Department Of Correction
as 7:2014cv05996
Plaintiff:
Gregory J. Graham
Defendant:
The New York City Department Of Correction
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Ramrattan v. Fischer, et al.
as 1:2013cv06890
Plaintiff:
Jerry Ramrattan
Defendant:
Brian Fischer, Ada Perez, Thomas LaValley and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Rahman v. Schriro et al
as 7:2013cv06095
Plaintiff:
Esteban Herrera, Sean Smith, Malik Rahman and others
Defendant:
Commissioner Dora Schriro, Warden Luis Rivera, Deputy Warden Russo and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Rasaun v. Wolf et al
as 1:2011cv05579
Plaintiff:
Rasaun Bullock
Defendant:
Richard T. Wolf, Dora Shapiro, N.Y.C. and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
