Prison Condition Cases filed in the Second Circuit Courts
Cases 51 - 60 of 1,663
Mustafa v. Doe et al
as 3:2024cv00507
Plaintiff: Wasim Mustafa
Defendant: John Doe
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Daniels v. State of Connecticut et al
as 3:2024cv00582
Plaintiff: Raeshon Kenneth Daniels
Defendant: State of Connecticut, Dept. of Correction, Osborn and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Dudley v. Semple et al
as 3:2024cv00543
Plaintiff: Robert Vincent Dudley
Defendant: Semple, City of Sommers, State of Connecticut and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Battle v. John Doe Nurse et al
as 6:2024cv06191
Plaintiff: Shaquill Battle
Defendant: John Doe Nurse, J. Brooks, Insania and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Rodriguez v. Semple et al
as 3:2024cv00566
Plaintiff: Christopher Rodriguez
Defendant: Scott Semple, Edward Maldonado, Carol Chapdelaine and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Rowell et al v. Doe et al
as 3:2024cv00698
Plaintiff: Jeffrey B. Rowell
Defendant: John Doe
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Moore v. Doe et al
as 3:2024cv00388
Plaintiff: Morris Moore, Jr
Defendant: John Doe and Jane Doe
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Vasquez v. Doe et al
as 3:2024cv00589
Plaintiff: Alexander Vasquez
Defendant: John Doe
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Barnes v. Quiros et al
as 3:2024cv00647
Plaintiff: Willie Barnes
Defendant: A. Quiros, Martin, Moore and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Urena v. The City of New York et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2024cv01886
Plaintiff: Amaury Urena
Defendant: The City of New York, Department of Justice and John Doe
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?