Cases 1 - 10 of 14
Montes v. Miller et al
as 1:2024cv04141
Plaintiff:
Germaine Montes
Defendant:
Superintendent Mark Miller, Jane Doe 1, Jane Doe 2 and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Sierra v. John Doe 22 et al
as 6:2022cv06042
Plaintiff:
Leonidas Sierra
Defendant:
John Doe 22, Captain Rzerniak, J. Fitchette and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Liverpool v. The City of New York et al
as 1:2020cv04664
Defendant:
John Doe #5, John Doe #4, John Doe #1 and others
Plaintiff:
Anton F. Liverpool
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Kruppenbacher v. Annuci et al
as 1:2020cv00071
Defendant:
John Doe # 9 Correctional Officer, Thomas R. Griffin, Christopher A. Batista and others
Plaintiff:
Joseph Kruppenbacher
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
McKinney v. NYC Department of Corrections et al
as 1:2019cv05320
Plaintiff:
Michael McKinney
Defendant:
NYC Department of Corrections, Manhattan Detention Center, N.Y.C. Board of Corrections and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Colson v. Mingo et al
as 1:2018cv02765
Plaintiff:
Ronald Colson
Defendant:
Mingo, Williams, Johnson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Crawford v. Montgomery et al
as 1:2017cv08075
Plaintiff:
Steven Crawford
Defendant:
Montgomery, S. Urbanski, R. Rappa and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Barton v. Doe #1 et al
as 1:2015cv07690
Plaintiff:
Ivan Sean Barton
Defendant:
John Doe #1, John Doe #2, John Doe #3 and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Walton v. The City of New York et al
as 1:2015cv03080
Plaintiff:
Samuel Walton
Defendant:
Jane Doe #1, John Doe #1, John Doe #2 and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Carvalho v. Smith
as 14-2905
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Woody Carvalho
Defendant - Appellee:
Correction Officer L. J. Smith, Badge # 12346, D. Bramble, Badge # 124612, Hearing Officer John Doe, #12524 and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
