Cases 101 - 110 of 1,782
Mitchem, Jr. v. New York University et al
as 1:2023cv07320
Plaintiff:
Emery Leon Mitchem, Jr.
Defendant:
New York University and Does 1 through 20
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 451 Employment Discrimination
Albaneze et al v. Biegel et al
as 1:2023cv07197
Plaintiff:
Jeffery T. Albaneze, Matthew B. Cochran and Kaitlyn P. Weatherly
Defendant:
Mark D. Biegel and BDO USA, P.A.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 bc Diversity-Breach of Contract
Mullings v. A. Duie Pyle, Inc.
as 5:2023cv00987
Plaintiff:
Adam Mullings
Defendant:
A. Duie Pyle, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Employment Discrimination
Abbate v. Lyons et al
as 1:2023cv06042
Plaintiff:
Anna Abbate
Defendant:
Marilyn S. Lyons and Paul V. Lyons
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Other Contract
Applegate v. The Mount Sinai Hospital
as 1:2023cv06981
Plaintiff:
William Applegate
Defendant:
The Mount Sinai Hospital
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 lr Diversity - Labor
Cestaro v. Prohaska
as 23-1120
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Joseph Cestaro
Defendant / Appellee:
Michael Prohaska and Construction and General Building Laborers Local 79
Blackwood-Pena v. Air Canada
as 1:2023cv05870
Plaintiff:
Suzette Blackwood-Pena
Defendant:
Air Canada
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-(Citizenship)
Horsepower Electric and Maintenance Corp. v. National Labor Relations Board et al
as 1:2023cv05707
Defendant:
National Labor Relations Board, NLRB and Teresa Poor
Plaintiff:
Horsepower Electric and Maintenance Corp.
Intervenor:
Shloime Spira
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2201 Injunction
Schuman v. Fresenius Medical Care Holdings, Inc.
as 2:2023cv05731
Plaintiff:
Robert Schuman
Defendant:
Fresenius Medical Care Holdings, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-(Citizenship)
Maurer v. National Carwash Solutions, INC.
as 1:2023cv00916
Plaintiff:
Mark Maurer
Defendant:
National Carwash Solutions, INC.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-(Citizenship)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
