Cases 1 - 10 of 75
Bueno et al v. General Electric Company et al
as 1:2024cv00822
Defendant:
General Electric Company, H. Lawrence Culp, Jr., John Does 1-5 and others
Plaintiff:
Julie Bueno, Darlene Hollins and David Bueno
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1132 E.R.I.S.A.-Employee Benefits
Singh v. Deloitte LLP
as 23-1108
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Rupinder Singh, individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated, Jeffrey S. Popkin, individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated, Joni Walker, individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated and others
Defendant / Appellee:
Deloitte LLP, The Board of Directors of Deloitte LLP, The Retirement Plan Committee of Deloitte LLP and others
Pessin v. JPMorgan Chase U.S. Benefits Executive
as 23-25
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Joseph Pessin, on behalf of himself and all others similarly situated
Defendant / Appellee:
JPMorgan Chase U.S. Benefits Executive, as Plan Administrator of the JPMorgan Chase Retirement Plan, Board of Directors of JPMorgan Chase Bank and J.P. Morgan Chase & Company and JPMorgan Chase Retirement Plan
Harris et al v. Swiss Re American Holding Corporation et al
as 1:2022cv07059
Plaintiff:
Shawyne Harris, Robert Taylor and Sidney Dasent
Defendant:
Swiss Re American Holding Corporation, Board of Directors of Swiss Re American Holding Corporation, Swiss Re American Holding Corporation Governance & Nomination Committee and others
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1109 Breach of Fiduciary Duties
Pessin v. JPMorgan Chase U.S. Benefits Executive et al
as 1:2022cv02436
Plaintiff:
Joseph Pessin
Defendant:
JPMorgan Chase U.S. Benefits Executive, Board of Directors of JPMorgan Chase Bank and J.P. Morgan Chase & Company and JPMorgan Chase Retirement Plan
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1001 E.R.I.S.A.: Employee Retirement
Ferguson v. Ruane Cuniff & Goldfarb Inc.
as 22-275
Plaintiff / Appellee:
Michael L. Ferguson, Myrl C. Jeffcoat and Deborah Smith, on behalf of the DST Systems, Inc. 401(K) Profit Sharing Plan
Defendant / Appellee:
DST Systems, Inc., The Advisory Committee of the DST Systems, Inc. 401(K) Profit Sharing Plan and The Compensation Committee of the Board of Directors of DST Systems, Inc.
Defendant:
Ruane Cunniff & Goldfarb Inc., George L. Argyros, Tim Bahr and others
Intervenor:
James DuCharme, Robert Canfield, Bonnie Kartz and others
Ruilova et al v. Yale-New Haven Hospital, Inc. et al
as 3:2022cv00111
Plaintiff:
Kaity Ruilova and Eileen Brannigan
Defendant:
Yale-New Haven Hospital, Inc., Board of Directors of Yale-New Haven Hospital, Inc., Investment Oversight Committee of the Yale-New Haven Hospital and Tax Exempt Affiliates Tax Sheltered Annuity Plan and others
Amicus Curiae:
Chamber of Commerce of the United States of America, American Hospital Association and Association of American Medical Colleges
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1132 E.R.I.S.A.-Employee Benefits
Cleary et al v. Kaleida Health et al
as 1:2022cv00025
Plaintiff:
Roxanne Cleary, Lisa Wendling, Kimberly Miller and others
Defendant:
Kaleida Health, Kaleida Health Retirement Plan Committee, Board of Directors of Kaleida and others
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1001 E.R.I.S.A.: Employee Retirement
Cleary et al v. Kaleida Health et al
as 1:2022cv00026
Plaintiff:
Roxanne Cleary, Lisa Wendling, Kimberly Miller and others
Defendant:
Kaleida Health, Kaleida Health Pension Growth Plan, Kaleida Health Retirement Plan Committee and others
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1001 E.R.I.S.A.: Employee Retirement
Singh et al v. Deloitte LLP et al
as 1:2021cv08458
Plaintiff:
Rupinder Singh, Jeffrey S. Popkin, Joni Walker and others
Defendant:
Deloitte LLP, The Board of Directors of Deloitte LLP, The Retirement Plan Committee of Deloitte LLP and others
Amicus Curiae:
Chamber of Commerce of the United States of America
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1132 E.R.I.S.A.: Civil Enforcement of Employee Benefits
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
