Securities/Commodities/Exchanges Cases filed in Connecticut
Cases 1 - 10 of 10
New England Teamsters Pension Fund v. RTX Corporation et al
as 3:2023cv01274
Plaintiff: New England Teamsters Pension Fund
Defendant: RTX Corporation, Gregory Hayes, Neil Mitchill and others
Petitioner: William Chow, Westchester Putnam Counties Heavy & Highway Laborers Local 60 Benefits Fund and United Union of Roofers, Waterproofers & Allied Workers Local Union No. 8 WBPA Fund
Peneycad v. RTX Corporation et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 3:2023cv01035
Defendant: RTX Corporation, Raytheon Technologies Corporation, Gregory Hayes and others
Plaintiff: Joshua Peneycad
Interested Party: New England Teamsters Pension Fund
St. Lucie County Fire District Firefighters' Pension Trust Fund v. Frontier Communications Corp. et al
as 3:2017cv01825
Defendant: Frontier Communications Corp. , Daniel McCarthy , John M. Jureller and others
Plaintiff: St. Lucie County Fire District Firefighters' Pension Trust Fund
Movant: Richard Linke , Raymond East, Jr. , Michael Holub and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 78
In re: Frontier Communications, Corp. Stockholders Litigation We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 3:2017cv01617
Defendant: Donald W. Daniels, John M. Jureller, Ralph Perley McBride and others
Plaintiff: Chris Bray and Gene R. Wills
Petitioner: Kevin Demet, John Dubois, Raymond East, Jr. and others
Consolidated Plaintiff: Larraine D. Segil, Larisa Rosenberg, St. Lucie County Fire District Firefighters' Pension Trust Fund and others
Consolidated Defendant: Daniel McCarthy, Peter C.B. Bynoe, Mizuho Securities USA Inc. and others
In Re: Frontier Communications, Corp. Stockholders Litigation
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 78
Leone v. Teva Pharmaceutical Industries Ltd. et al
as 3:2017cv00559
Plaintiff: Anthony Leone
Defendant: Teva Pharmaceutical Industries Ltd., Erez Vigodman, Eyal Desheh and others
Movant: Ontario Teachers' Pension Plan Board
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 78
Ontario Teachers' Pension Plan Board, et al v. Teva Pharmaceutical Industries Ltd. et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 3:2017cv00558
Plaintiff: Galmi, Amram Galmi, Anchorage Police & Fire Retirement System and others
Defendant: Teva Pharmaceutical Industries Ltd, Deborah Griffin, BBVA Securities, Inc. and others
Consolidated Plaintiff: Franklin Investors Securities Trust, Franklin Templeton Investments Corp., Franklin Templeton Investment Funds and others
Interested Party: East 71, Ltd., Brahman Partners II, L.P., Brahman Partners III, L.P. and others
Petitioner: Waterford Township Police and Fire Retirement System, Barry Baker, Public School Teachers Pension and Retirement System of Chicago and others
Consolidated Defendant: Shlomo Yanai, Yitzhak Peterburg, Yaacov Altman and others
Intervenor: United States of America and HMG Global Initiative Inc.
Intervenor Plaintiff: Certain funds and accounts managed by TIAA-CREF Investment Management LLC and Teachers Advisors LLC, TIAA-CREF Investment Management LLC, TIAA-CREF Investment Management LLC on behalf of certain of its managed funds and accounts and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 78
Miller v. USA et al
as 3:2010cv01317
Plaintiff: Anthony M. Miller
Defendant: USA, Securities & Exchange Commission and Financial Regulatory Authority
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1346
Chalverus v. Bershad et al
as 3:2010cv00901
Plaintiff: Joseph Chalverus
Defendant: Stephen W. Bershad, Anthony J. Fiorelli, Jr., Eliot M. Fried and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 78
Anthony v. Massachusetts et al
as 3:2007cv01235
Plaintiff: Silva Wayne Anthony
Defendant: State of Massachusetts and United States
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 77 Securities Fraud
Anthony v. Massachusetts et al
as 3:2007mc00232
Plaintiff: Silva Wayne Anthony
Defendant: State of Massachusetts and United States
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 77 Securities Fraud

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?